OK.6maniac wrote:Aardy, treat it as straight and tell the idiot what he's in for !
The best you can hope for is a $336 fine. With the introduction of new offences and new penalties for driving/riding whilst unlicenced last year (I think?), there has been some complication and as a result a differing of opinions regarding the appropriate offence for this set of circumstances. Some, like myself, agree that it is an on the spot fine. Others believe that the matter needs to be presented before the courts. I wont go into the technicalities of it here, but either way, you won't get off of it.
So, the worst you can expect is to find yourself visiting the local lock-up and having yourself presented to "your honour". You can probably also expect to recieve the blunt end of the officers humour. This often involves the bike being defected for a possible breach involving a non-compliant rear guard, chain guard, indicators or similar. This normally means a reasonably expensive trip the vehicle inspection station.
Having said that, the insurance complications that others have brought up are the biggest risk factor.
Ah-huh. I guess that means that people driving vehicles which are at a stand-still are NEVER involved in a crash? Not sure how that explains a lot of the rear-enders that occur in peak hour? The reason they restrict the bike you ride isn't all about the power or speed it's capable of. It's because of your lack of road craft on a bike. By reducing the amount of performance on offer, it's just one less thing for you to be thinking about whilst you ride around. And in my experience, learners or unlicenced riders on high-performance bikes often ride like total fuck-wits.sly_papa wrote:And i wont crash cause i wont be going fast
It's all well and good for your uncle to insure it, but does his policy cover someone in your age bracket?
As for the comment regarding other people hitting you, and that they'll have to pay. Wait until their insurance company finds out you don't have the appropriate licence. Not only will they try and portion some of the blame onto you, say 10-20%, just because you where on the road, but they'll then start throwing around claims that you caused it because of your lack of licence. I don't own an insurance company, but if I did, I wouldn't want to waste my money defending you on that one.
And let's not even get into the third-part bodily side of things.
I tell you what though, you do what ever you want to. You will anyway.