

but yet about 2 months ago i went for a ride a whole 2km and i decided not to wear my jacket for the first time but i still wore my kevlar pants and i got pulled over by the cops!!!!! WTF!!!!!

does anybody else see this or am i alone on this one?
no different to m/c riders mate - heaps of scooter tramps up here also ride around the CBD in tees and shorts. At the low speeds they do in the CBD streets, they are only going to loose as much skin as a treadlie rider would if they fell off......andew wrote:.......i was just wondering what were the rules for scooter riders for clothing protection?.....
andew wrote:i was just wondering what were the rules for scooter riders for clothing protection?coz i was in Richmond the other day and i couldn't help but i noticed at least 20 scooters around there and not one of them was wearing kevlars or leathers but they were wearing shorts and t-shirts
.........
well that wont help the road toll than will itseiko1 wrote: I'm all for the girl's riding naked though
It will help it increase substantiallyphilbo wrote:well that wont help the road toll than will itseiko1 wrote: I'm all for the girl's riding naked though![]()
![]()
yeah i wasnt too sure on the rules but the cop did definetly pull me over for not wearing a jacket now i know thanks guys you have all been very helpfullmick_dundee wrote:To ride "legally" you must wear an Aus standards approved helmet, that's it, full stop, period, no if's buts or maybe's, that is what you "need" to wear to ride legally, if you go out and ride buck naked with a helmet on you might well get busted for indecent exposure but that's got bugger all to do with the bike.
So to answer your question, the scooter riders, the gixxer riders and indeed you without your jacket are riding with all you need to legally wear assuming you have a lid on.
See here http://www.mravic.org.au/forum/modules/ ... oryid=1677 for a letter from the TAC and some responses in regards, it's an ongoing issue the MRA Vic and the TAC have with each other, not that we don't agree with protective clothing, but reducing liability payments due to it on a no fault insurance scheme is just plain wrong!