Maty10 wrote:I-K wrote:All manufacturers fib with their tachos just as much as they do with their speedos.
Fibbing on the tacho is fine, but to activily market this "feature" as an advantage over other bikes, thats just wrong on so many levels
Any more levels than claiming a bike weighs 170kg when it actually weighs 196kg, or claiming it to make 180hp when it really makes 155hp?
It's not like Yamaha are making any more of a centrepiece of the R6's new redline than everyone makes of their bike's dry weight or crank hp.
Ultimately, if all Yamaha are claiming for the R6 is the highest-revving engine in the class, they're not actually lying, are they? Even If everyone else didn't fib to the tune of 1,000rpm or thereabouts, the R6's competition, all of which redline at an indicated 15,500rpm, would_still_have lower revlimits than the R6's measured 16,200rpm...
It always raises a chuckle when MotorcycleDaily.com go off on one of their technical tangents, because it shows how little clue they have. How can valve springs cope with such high revs? Does the technology exist?
They invited email responses on the subject; the one in which I pointed out that all four Japanese manufacturers were turning out 4-cylinder, 16-valve 250's with 19,000rpm indicated revlimits in the late 80's went unacknowledged.