GPS accuracy in forests
- dilligaf
- KSRC Contributor
- Posts: 1675
- Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 8:24 am
- Bike: Z900
- State: Victoria
- Location: Melbourne
GPS accuracy in forests
Been taking a little GPS with me to calibrate the speedo. (the speedo is about 10% high at normalish speeds). But after runs in the hills it tells me I had maximum speeds 20 or 30k greater than I thought I was doing. I suspect this is a problem with the GPS and not my speedo being out the other way at speed. (the gps did once have the bar of Meredith pub doing 430k). Anyone else experience this?
That is why God made fast motorcycles, Bubba.... Hunter S. Thompson.
- seiko1
- Apprentice Post Whore :-)
- Posts: 7643
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:36 pm
- Bike: ZX14R
- State: Victoria
- Location: Geelong
Re: GPS accuracy in forests
I run GPS in country Vic and it is shocking with streets.
Always miles out in Bannockburn and Mortlake and Terang but speed hasn't been an issue cause the
Truck is a wee bit slower than your bike
Always miles out in Bannockburn and Mortlake and Terang but speed hasn't been an issue cause the
Truck is a wee bit slower than your bike

Policy - Find something simple.....and Complicate it!
Re: GPS accuracy in forests
dilligaf !


- seiko1
- Apprentice Post Whore :-)
- Posts: 7643
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:36 pm
- Bike: ZX14R
- State: Victoria
- Location: Geelong
Re: GPS accuracy in forests
What about him?hoffy wrote:dilligaf !

Policy - Find something simple.....and Complicate it!
- dilligaf
- KSRC Contributor
- Posts: 1675
- Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 8:24 am
- Bike: Z900
- State: Victoria
- Location: Melbourne
Re: GPS accuracy in forests
dilligafayngaf
That is why God made fast motorcycles, Bubba.... Hunter S. Thompson.
-
- KSRC Regular
- Posts: 947
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 7:12 pm
- Bike: It's not worth Mentioning
- State: Victoria
- Location: bayside vic
Re: GPS accuracy in forests
.. 'ayngaf.............
.........lost me.....

- dilligaf
- KSRC Contributor
- Posts: 1675
- Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 8:24 am
- Bike: Z900
- State: Victoria
- Location: Melbourne
Re: GPS accuracy in forests
does it look like i give a fuck about you not giving a fuck
That is why God made fast motorcycles, Bubba.... Hunter S. Thompson.
-
- Team Monster
- Posts: 3430
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 5:52 pm
- Bike: ZX6R
- State: Please Select a State
Re: GPS accuracy in forests
Most GPS's have a satellite screen (my two have anyway) maybe do a run with it on this page and make sure you have at least 3 satellite's to triangulate your position.....Unless there is heavy tree overgroth I think it should work fine....
Stopping=Crashing!
- dilligaf
- KSRC Contributor
- Posts: 1675
- Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 8:24 am
- Bike: Z900
- State: Victoria
- Location: Melbourne
Re: GPS accuracy in forests
Thanks. I'll try that. The tree growth is fairly heavy.
That is why God made fast motorcycles, Bubba.... Hunter S. Thompson.
- 6maniac
- KSRC Addict
- Posts: 4832
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 7:26 pm
- Bike: Z750
- State: New South Wales
- Location: Hawkesbury
Re: GPS accuracy in forests
So what's the problem, mate ? Did you forget to draw a map of where the treasure was buried ? 

I've spent over 40 years of my life riding bikes .... the rest of it, I wasted ..
If it's got wheels or tits, it's gonna give you trouble !
HCST #2
Team Black '09 ..... R.I.P. - 2011.
Back in Black....2011.
If it's got wheels or tits, it's gonna give you trouble !
HCST #2
Team Black '09 ..... R.I.P. - 2011.
Back in Black....2011.
- esie
- KSRC Contributor
- Posts: 1357
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 1:33 pm
- Bike: Z1000
- State: Queensland
- Location: Brisbane
Re: GPS accuracy in forests
When we are out geocaching we find that under heavy tree cover the GPS signal moves around, as it bounces of braches, leaves and hills, therefore not giving an accurate position. If you want to test your speedo using GPS, you would be best to do it on a straight flat road with no tree cover whatsoever.
Cheers,
Anne
Note: No trees were killed in the sending of this message, but a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
Anne
Note: No trees were killed in the sending of this message, but a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
- mike-s
- Apprentice Post Whore :-)
- Posts: 6142
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 5:43 am
- Bike: Suzuki
- State: New South Wales
- Location: Arncliffe, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: GPS accuracy in forests
Another thing that affects it is hills & buildings. that is why sometimes you also get weird shit happening with gps's when you go through a segment of a city where there are a mass of tall buildings next to each other (prime example = castlereigh street in sydney cbd)
- aardvark
- Apprentice Post Whore :-)
- Posts: 5766
- Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 6:45 pm
- Bike: Yamaha
- State: South Australia
- Location: Adelaide, S.A.
- Contact:
Re: GPS accuracy in forests
Every time I've buried a body in the forest I've marked it on the GPS. I've always been able to find my way back to them.
- mike-s
- Apprentice Post Whore :-)
- Posts: 6142
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 5:43 am
- Bike: Suzuki
- State: New South Wales
- Location: Arncliffe, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: GPS accuracy in forests
No worries Ivan, you keep on keeping on!
- drunkmeerkat
- Newbie
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 5:06 pm
- Bike: ZX6R
- State: New South Wales
- Location: Sydney
Re: GPS accuracy in forests
With all GPS receivers, the position accuracy is related to the strength of the signal from the satellites, and the number of satellites in view. Position degradation can be caused by signals being bounced off trees and buildings as mentioned above (called multi-path effects), but also due to the receiver noise.
You can't do too much about the multi-path stuff, but you can improve the signal quality with a good quality active antenna. Does the unit you are using have a connector for an external antenna ? An active (powered antenna) will be better than a passive one.. you can pick them up for around $30..
This will help you pick up more satellites, and improve the quality of the signal coming in...
Another issue which may be affecting your speed reading, is the accuracy of the timing information. The receiver calculates speed = change in position / change in time. If the GPS is only logging position once per second (1 Hz), any problems with the accuracy of the timing will result in speed error (you only need 50 milliseconds of timing error for 20% speed error).. Thats why GPS receivers which log at 5 or 10 times per second, can average the 5 or 10 speed calculations over 1 second, and provide a seemingly smooth speed calculation...
If you need any more info re: receivers or antennas, let me know..
cheers.
You can't do too much about the multi-path stuff, but you can improve the signal quality with a good quality active antenna. Does the unit you are using have a connector for an external antenna ? An active (powered antenna) will be better than a passive one.. you can pick them up for around $30..
This will help you pick up more satellites, and improve the quality of the signal coming in...
Another issue which may be affecting your speed reading, is the accuracy of the timing information. The receiver calculates speed = change in position / change in time. If the GPS is only logging position once per second (1 Hz), any problems with the accuracy of the timing will result in speed error (you only need 50 milliseconds of timing error for 20% speed error).. Thats why GPS receivers which log at 5 or 10 times per second, can average the 5 or 10 speed calculations over 1 second, and provide a seemingly smooth speed calculation...
If you need any more info re: receivers or antennas, let me know..
cheers.