Nothing like a midnight Game of "Hide the HELMET" eh "DingoMick"Mick C wrote:What happens on the road trip, stays on the road trip...Wattie wrote:dont wwanna know how you found that outMick C wrote: Don't worry, Ponti's only a little fella![]()
could be the cause of your rash?? might be moustache rash...
DYNO CHARTS - ALL MAKES AND MODELS WANTED
- Nanna10r
- Team Ninja
- Posts: 4291
- Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2004 10:42 pm
- Bike: ZX10R
- State: Queensland
- Location: Brisbane Australia
"Nan & Pop Racing"
Poppy Hops on .... CBR150 (Superlite) CBR954 "Blade"
Nanna Naps on .... MoriWAKI NSR85 (Motolite) ZX10R "Crim"
We may ride like Old Can'ts, But Phuk we look DOOG !!!!!!
Poppy Hops on .... CBR150 (Superlite) CBR954 "Blade"
Nanna Naps on .... MoriWAKI NSR85 (Motolite) ZX10R "Crim"
We may ride like Old Can'ts, But Phuk we look DOOG !!!!!!
and you still haven't given me my twenty centsPontikat wrote:Nothing like a midnight Game of "Hide the HELMET" eh "DingoMick"Mick C wrote:What happens on the road trip, stays on the road trip...Wattie wrote: dont wwanna know how you found that out![]()
could be the cause of your rash?? might be moustache rash...

just don't show the photos OK?
'13 Z1000, '76 Z650+,'91 KLR250, '95 ZX6R Racebike
-
- KSRC Contributor
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 3:22 pm
- Bike: Suzuki
- State: New South Wales
- Location: Sydney (again...)
Well, do the maths... the difference between 39hp and 42hp is 3hp, or ~8% of the lower figure. So, to get the extra 3hp, you need one stock engine to pump that much more fuel/air mixture and to run that much more efficiently that it ends up making 8% more power than another stock engine.Stereo wrote:Surely 42hp is not such an out there figure that it cannot be done.....I-K wrote:I rather suspect the dyno operator might've selected "Ego boost" for the correction factor on that run.mitch179 wrote:my old cbr250rr used to kick out something like 42hp (i had it dyno'd lol)
even had 80,000 k's on it!
Four-cylinder four-stroke 250's kick out between 36 and 39hp on the dyno.
To put that in perspective, fitting a full system to, say, a 600, and tuning the EFI to suit will lift its power from 100hp-and-a-bit to 110hp-and-a-bit, say from 106hp to 115hp; an increase of 9hp, or just over 8%.
See why I'm being skeptical?
i dont understand why you cant believe it, a mate of mine had his bike there the same week and his put out 43 (cbr250rr aswell) i cant find the print out right now but im looking for it ......
the claimed power of a cbr250 is 45ps
so its not impossible by any means, and ive seen heaps of 250's putting out around 40 - 45 hp.
like i said i dont care for defending them cause they are a nugget anyways and i have a better bike now.. but i dont want u to be going "OMG LIES MAN!@#!"
the claimed power of a cbr250 is 45ps
so its not impossible by any means, and ive seen heaps of 250's putting out around 40 - 45 hp.
like i said i dont care for defending them cause they are a nugget anyways and i have a better bike now.. but i dont want u to be going "OMG LIES MAN!@#!"
-
- KSRC Contributor
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 3:22 pm
- Bike: Suzuki
- State: New South Wales
- Location: Sydney (again...)
Well, read over my previous post again. It's all there in numbers.mitch179 wrote:i dont understand why you cant believe it,
Well, there you go. We now have two BabyBlades making more power than expected on the same dyno. More evidence that the dyno in question reads high.a mate of mine had his bike there the same week and his put out 43 (cbr250rr aswell) i cant find the print out right now but im looking for it ......
At the crank. Knock the expected ~15% drivetrain power loss off that (which is 6.75hp), and you have 38.25hp at the rear wheel, which is what BabyBlades record on a stringent dyno.the claimed power of a cbr250 is 45ps
All on that one dyno?so its not impossible by any means, and ive seen heaps of 250's putting out around 40 - 45 hp.
If the operator is applying correction factors to extrapolate the rear-wheel reading back to the crank (which he shouldn't be), that would explain the high readings.
Again, read back over everything I've said... who, except the dyno, am I accusing of being wrong?like i said i dont care for defending them cause they are a nugget anyways and i have a better bike now.. but i dont want u to be going "OMG LIES MAN!@#!"
-
- Warming up
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 10:21 pm
- Location: Reservoir, Melbourne
- Gosling1
- Team Donut
- Posts: 13823
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 9:30 pm
- Bike: Z900
- State: ACT
- Location: Anarchy Road
mitch179 wrote:ive seen read outs from different dyno's giving similar figures ... i could probably find them if you really want me to ?
whatever tho, you are seriously a typical know it all.



".....shut the gate on this one Maxie......it's the ducks guts !!............."
- ross79
- KSRC Member
- Posts: 274
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 10:16 am
- Bike: Suzuki
- State: Victoria
- Location: Castlemaine
I'm with you mate. I also had a cbr250rr (full race system). Although I never got around to chucking in on a dyno, it felt shitloads faster than any other 250 I've ridden.mitch179 wrote:ive seen read outs from different dyno's giving similar figures ... i could probably find them if you really want me to ?
whatever tho, you are seriously a typical know it all.
SOLD 2000 ZX12R .
-
- KSRC Contributor
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 3:22 pm
- Bike: Suzuki
- State: New South Wales
- Location: Sydney (again...)
You could, but, once again, without knowing the correction factor applied to the dyno run, the peak power figure is largely meaningless.mitch179 wrote:ive seen read outs from different dyno's giving similar figures ... i could probably find them if you really want me to ?
Well, one thing I don't know is how a bike which claims 45hp at the crank can lay down 42hp on a dyno without that second number being treated with suspicion.whatever tho, you are seriously a typical know it all.
- Wattie
- VIP MEMBER
- Posts: 10041
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 12:23 pm
- Bike: ZX10R
- State: New South Wales
- Location: Bligh Park
ok, dont flame me please
but i been thinkin...
if a zx12 can pump out 200hp on a dyno, (not attaking the 12 owner
)
if you divide, 200 by 1200cc
and multiply that figure by 250cc
you get about 42hp.
meaning a scaled down 1200 can get 42hp at the wheel.
why cant a cbr do the same??
with a few little mods, and remembering a cbr is reving to 18,000rpm
(imaging what a zx12 would be pumping out if it could rev to that!!
)
anyways, thats my numbers... carry on..

but i been thinkin...
if a zx12 can pump out 200hp on a dyno, (not attaking the 12 owner

if you divide, 200 by 1200cc
and multiply that figure by 250cc
you get about 42hp.
meaning a scaled down 1200 can get 42hp at the wheel.
why cant a cbr do the same??
with a few little mods, and remembering a cbr is reving to 18,000rpm
(imaging what a zx12 would be pumping out if it could rev to that!!

anyways, thats my numbers... carry on..
Wattie #55
ZX10R "The Crim"
ZX10R "Gumby"
Proudly Supported by Allfixed Automotive 9634 1455
sam & srt, survived
RGM, left a message
ZX10R "The Crim"
ZX10R "Gumby"
Proudly Supported by Allfixed Automotive 9634 1455
sam & srt, survived
RGM, left a message