Non Bike related Discussion - no politics or religion pls.
Neka79
Extreme Post Whore :-)
Posts: 13115 Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 12:20 am
Bike: Z900
State: South Australia
Location: Adelaide......nah its cool..no really!!
Contact:
Post
by Neka79 » Wed Feb 01, 2006 11:33 am
Stereo wrote: Bartofsky wrote: still not as fast as a bike though. But it is a seriously nice bit of kit... for a car.
Its faster than a fair few bikes...
depends who riding the bike i reckon...
Neka
2006 Zeddy 1000
1996 VS series 2 S pak Ute
Stereo
KSRC Addict
Posts: 4578 Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 8:01 am
Bike: ZX10R
State: Victoria
Location: Pt Cook, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Pacific Ocean, Earth
Post
by Stereo » Thu Feb 02, 2006 9:38 am
Lambourghini Diablo
0-60 mph: 3.6 sec
0-100 mph: 8.8 sec
Quarter Mile: 12 sec @ 122 mph
Skidpad: .97g
Top Speed: 205 mph
Braking, 60-0 mph: 109 ft
Slalom Speed: 70 mph
The world is round. It has no point.
mobile
KSRC Member
Posts: 426 Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 12:09 pm
Bike: ZX10R
State: Victoria
Location: Berwick, Victoria
Contact:
Post
by mobile » Thu Feb 02, 2006 1:53 pm
Yeah, but where's the spot to carry the bike, after all when you get tired of driving, you'll have to ride the bike
Mobile -> Static -> Mobile Again, ahh how good that feels
Neka79
Extreme Post Whore :-)
Posts: 13115 Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 12:20 am
Bike: Z900
State: South Australia
Location: Adelaide......nah its cool..no really!!
Contact:
Post
by Neka79 » Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:31 pm
Stereo wrote: Lambourghini Diablo 0-60 mph: 3.6 sec 0-100 mph: 8.8 sec Quarter Mile: 12 sec @ 122 mph Skidpad: .97g Top Speed: 205 mph Braking, 60-0 mph: 109 ft Slalom Speed: 70 mph
i dunno my 0-60 speed...but i kno my 1/4 time is 11.1 sec...
interesting....
Neka
2006 Zeddy 1000
1996 VS series 2 S pak Ute
aardvark
Apprentice Post Whore :-)
Posts: 5766 Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 6:45 pm
Bike: Yamaha
State: South Australia
Location: Adelaide, S.A.
Contact:
Post
by aardvark » Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:05 am
neka79 wrote: i dunno my 0-60 speed...
Most bikes have a 0-60 (Close enough to 0 - 100km/h to not make a difference) of around 3 seconds... give or take.
Stereo
KSRC Addict
Posts: 4578 Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 8:01 am
Bike: ZX10R
State: Victoria
Location: Pt Cook, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Pacific Ocean, Earth
Post
by Stereo » Fri Feb 03, 2006 6:28 am
Not many bikes have a top speed of 205 MILES per hour
The world is round. It has no point.
mick_dundee
Team Naked
Posts: 5344 Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 2:05 pm
Bike: Suzuki
State: Victoria
Location: Kilmore
Post
by mick_dundee » Fri Feb 03, 2006 6:47 am
aardvark wrote: Most bikes have a 0-60 (Close enough to 0 - 100km/h to not make a difference) of around 3 seconds... give or take.
Jase, figures from Stereo are in MILES per hour, bit of a diff b/n 60kmh and 60mph I suggest.
A good mate will bail you out of jail, a true mate will be sitting in the cell next to you saying "Damn, we fucked up!!!"
aardvark
Apprentice Post Whore :-)
Posts: 5766 Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 6:45 pm
Bike: Yamaha
State: South Australia
Location: Adelaide, S.A.
Contact:
Post
by aardvark » Fri Feb 03, 2006 10:15 am
mick_dundee wrote: aardvark wrote: Most bikes have a 0-60 (Close enough to 0 - 100km/h to not make a difference) of around 3 seconds... give or take.
Jase, figures from Stereo are in MILES per hour, bit of a diff b/n 60kmh and 60mph I suggest.
Errr, yeah, right. And?
Hence the reason I said "0-60 (Close enought to 0-100)"
60mph is 96.56kmh. Most bikes do the 0-100km/h or 0-60mph in around 3 secons. Some slightly less, some slightly more.
hidepenny
KSRC Regular
Posts: 970 Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 5:58 pm
Bike: ZX6R
State: Victoria
Location: Melbourne - Eastern
Post
by hidepenny » Fri Feb 03, 2006 11:07 am
Most bikes have a 0-60 (Close enough to 0 - 100km/h to not make a difference) of around 3 seconds...
definitely not my bike
even it was 0-60kph
Gosling1
Team Donut
Posts: 13823 Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 9:30 pm
Bike: Z900
State: ACT
Location: Anarchy Road
Post
by Gosling1 » Fri Feb 03, 2006 4:53 pm
Stereo wrote: Not many bikes have a top speed of 205 MILES per hour
*rubs belly*.....* gazes out window at ZX12R*.....*rubs belly*
".....shut the gate on this one Maxie......it's the ducks guts !!............."
sneakypete
KSRC Regular
Posts: 813 Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 9:52 pm
Bike: Z1000
State: New South Wales
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney
Post
by sneakypete » Sat Feb 04, 2006 7:48 am
neka79 wrote: cambo: version 2 wrote: u have no idea what i would do for a chance to drive one of them...... nice ride
blow your own trumpet??
if i could do that, i wouldn't have gotten married!!!!
1990 Honda RS250GP bike (race bike)
1992 Suzuki Across (GSX250)
1993 Honda CBR600
1995 Honda RVF400 (race bike)
1999 Kawasaki ZX9R
2005 Kawasaki Z1000
Neka79
Extreme Post Whore :-)
Posts: 13115 Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 12:20 am
Bike: Z900
State: South Australia
Location: Adelaide......nah its cool..no really!!
Contact:
Post
by Neka79 » Sat Feb 04, 2006 10:39 am
Stereo wrote: Not many bikes have a top speed of 205 MILES per hour
yea..but not many bikes cost $500,000 either...
and for the top speed difference (my blade does 290)....the $485000 DIFFERENCE IS...WELL U FIGURE IT OUT...
Neka
2006 Zeddy 1000
1996 VS series 2 S pak Ute
ZX10R King
KSRC Contributor
Posts: 1062 Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 5:49 am
Location: Coorparoo, Brisbane
Contact:
Post
by ZX10R King » Sat Feb 04, 2006 10:42 am
neka79 wrote: Stereo wrote: Not many bikes have a top speed of 205 MILES per hour
yea..but not many bikes cost $500,000 either...
and for the top speed difference (my blade does 290)....the $485000 DIFFERENCE IS...WELL U FIGURE IT OUT...
Also, don't forget fuel economy. In something like the Lambo, u give it a thrashing and u r lucky to get 4km/l. Even when ya thrash a bike, ya gotta get atleast twice that?
SXC in black, '05 ZX10R