Look what I've been in

Non Bike related Discussion - no politics or religion pls.
User avatar
Neka79
Extreme Post Whore :-)
Extreme Post Whore :-)
Posts: 13115
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 12:20 am
Bike: Z900
State: South Australia
Location: Adelaide......nah its cool..no really!!
Contact:

Post by Neka79 »

Stereo wrote:
Bartofsky wrote:still not as fast as a bike though. But it is a seriously nice bit of kit... for a car.


Its faster than a fair few bikes...

depends who riding the bike i reckon...
Neka
2006 Zeddy 1000
1996 VS series 2 S pak Ute
Image
User avatar
Stereo
KSRC Addict
KSRC Addict
Posts: 4578
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 8:01 am
Bike: ZX10R
State: Victoria
Location: Pt Cook, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Pacific Ocean, Earth

Post by Stereo »

Lambourghini Diablo

0-60 mph: 3.6 sec
0-100 mph: 8.8 sec
Quarter Mile: 12 sec @ 122 mph
Skidpad: .97g
Top Speed: 205 mph
Braking, 60-0 mph: 109 ft
Slalom Speed: 70 mph
The world is round. It has no point.
mobile
KSRC Member
KSRC Member
Posts: 426
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 12:09 pm
Bike: ZX10R
State: Victoria
Location: Berwick, Victoria
Contact:

Post by mobile »

Yeah, but where's the spot to carry the bike, after all when you get tired of driving, you'll have to ride the bike :lol:
Mobile -> Static -> Mobile Again, ahh how good that feels
Image
User avatar
Neka79
Extreme Post Whore :-)
Extreme Post Whore :-)
Posts: 13115
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 12:20 am
Bike: Z900
State: South Australia
Location: Adelaide......nah its cool..no really!!
Contact:

Post by Neka79 »

Stereo wrote:Lambourghini Diablo

0-60 mph: 3.6 sec
0-100 mph: 8.8 sec
Quarter Mile: 12 sec @ 122 mph
Skidpad: .97g
Top Speed: 205 mph
Braking, 60-0 mph: 109 ft
Slalom Speed: 70 mph


i dunno my 0-60 speed...but i kno my 1/4 time is 11.1 sec...

interesting....
Neka
2006 Zeddy 1000
1996 VS series 2 S pak Ute
Image
User avatar
aardvark
Apprentice Post Whore :-)
Apprentice Post Whore :-)
Posts: 5766
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 6:45 pm
Bike: Yamaha
State: South Australia
Location: Adelaide, S.A.
Contact:

Post by aardvark »

neka79 wrote:i dunno my 0-60 speed...


Most bikes have a 0-60 (Close enough to 0 - 100km/h to not make a difference) of around 3 seconds... give or take.
User avatar
Stereo
KSRC Addict
KSRC Addict
Posts: 4578
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 8:01 am
Bike: ZX10R
State: Victoria
Location: Pt Cook, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Pacific Ocean, Earth

Post by Stereo »

Not many bikes have a top speed of 205 MILES per hour
The world is round. It has no point.
mick_dundee
Team Naked
Team Naked
Posts: 5344
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 2:05 pm
Bike: Suzuki
State: Victoria
Location: Kilmore

Post by mick_dundee »

aardvark wrote:Most bikes have a 0-60 (Close enough to 0 - 100km/h to not make a difference) of around 3 seconds... give or take.


Jase, figures from Stereo are in MILES per hour, bit of a diff b/n 60kmh and 60mph I suggest.
A good mate will bail you out of jail, a true mate will be sitting in the cell next to you saying "Damn, we fucked up!!!"
User avatar
aardvark
Apprentice Post Whore :-)
Apprentice Post Whore :-)
Posts: 5766
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 6:45 pm
Bike: Yamaha
State: South Australia
Location: Adelaide, S.A.
Contact:

Post by aardvark »

mick_dundee wrote:
aardvark wrote:Most bikes have a 0-60 (Close enough to 0 - 100km/h to not make a difference) of around 3 seconds... give or take.


Jase, figures from Stereo are in MILES per hour, bit of a diff b/n 60kmh and 60mph I suggest.


Errr, yeah, right. And?

Hence the reason I said "0-60 (Close enought to 0-100)"

60mph is 96.56kmh. Most bikes do the 0-100km/h or 0-60mph in around 3 secons. Some slightly less, some slightly more.
hidepenny
KSRC Regular
KSRC Regular
Posts: 970
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 5:58 pm
Bike: ZX6R
State: Victoria
Location: Melbourne - Eastern

Post by hidepenny »

Most bikes have a 0-60 (Close enough to 0 - 100km/h to not make a difference) of around 3 seconds...


definitely not my bike :shock:

even it was 0-60kph :oops:
User avatar
Gosling1
Team Donut
Team Donut
Posts: 13823
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 9:30 pm
Bike: Z900
State: ACT
Location: Anarchy Road

Post by Gosling1 »

Stereo wrote:Not many bikes have a top speed of 205 MILES per hour


*rubs belly*.....* gazes out window at ZX12R*.....*rubs belly*

8)
".....shut the gate on this one Maxie......it's the ducks guts !!............."
User avatar
sneakypete
KSRC Regular
KSRC Regular
Posts: 813
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 9:52 pm
Bike: Z1000
State: New South Wales
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Post by sneakypete »

neka79 wrote:
cambo: version 2 wrote:u have no idea what i would do for a chance to drive one of them...... nice ride

blow your own trumpet??


if i could do that, i wouldn't have gotten married!!!! :roll:
1990 Honda RS250GP bike (race bike)
1992 Suzuki Across (GSX250)
1993 Honda CBR600
1995 Honda RVF400 (race bike)
1999 Kawasaki ZX9R
2005 Kawasaki Z1000
User avatar
Neka79
Extreme Post Whore :-)
Extreme Post Whore :-)
Posts: 13115
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 12:20 am
Bike: Z900
State: South Australia
Location: Adelaide......nah its cool..no really!!
Contact:

Post by Neka79 »

Stereo wrote:Not many bikes have a top speed of 205 MILES per hour

yea..but not many bikes cost $500,000 either...
and for the top speed difference (my blade does 290)....the $485000 DIFFERENCE IS...WELL U FIGURE IT OUT...
Neka
2006 Zeddy 1000
1996 VS series 2 S pak Ute
Image
ZX10R King
KSRC Contributor
KSRC Contributor
Posts: 1062
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 5:49 am
Location: Coorparoo, Brisbane
Contact:

Post by ZX10R King »

neka79 wrote:
Stereo wrote:Not many bikes have a top speed of 205 MILES per hour

yea..but not many bikes cost $500,000 either...
and for the top speed difference (my blade does 290)....the $485000 DIFFERENCE IS...WELL U FIGURE IT OUT...


Also, don't forget fuel economy. In something like the Lambo, u give it a thrashing and u r lucky to get 4km/l. Even when ya thrash a bike, ya gotta get atleast twice that?
SXC in black, '05 ZX10R

Image
Post Reply