Look what I've been in

Neka79 · Post by **Neka79** » Wed Feb 01, 2006 11:33 am

Stereo wrote:
Bartofsky wrote:still not as fast as a bike though. But it is a seriously nice bit of kit... for a car.
Its faster than a fair few bikes...

depends who riding the bike i reckon...

Stereo · Post by **Stereo** » Thu Feb 02, 2006 9:38 am

Lambourghini Diablo

0-60 mph: 3.6 sec
0-100 mph: 8.8 sec
Quarter Mile: 12 sec @ 122 mph
Skidpad: .97g
Top Speed: 205 mph
Braking, 60-0 mph: 109 ft
Slalom Speed: 70 mph

mobile · Post by **mobile** » Thu Feb 02, 2006 1:53 pm

Yeah, but where's the spot to carry the bike, after all when you get tired of driving, you'll have to ride the bike

Neka79 · Post by **Neka79** » Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:31 pm

Stereo wrote:Lambourghini Diablo

0-60 mph: 3.6 sec
0-100 mph: 8.8 sec
Quarter Mile: 12 sec @ 122 mph
Skidpad: .97g
Top Speed: 205 mph
Braking, 60-0 mph: 109 ft
Slalom Speed: 70 mph

i dunno my 0-60 speed...but i kno my 1/4 time is 11.1 sec...

interesting....

aardvark · Post by **aardvark** » Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:05 am

neka79 wrote:i dunno my 0-60 speed...

Most bikes have a 0-60 (Close enough to 0 - 100km/h to not make a difference) of around 3 seconds... give or take.

Stereo · Post by **Stereo** » Fri Feb 03, 2006 6:28 am

Not many bikes have a top speed of 205 MILES per hour

mick_dundee · Post by **mick_dundee** » Fri Feb 03, 2006 6:47 am

aardvark wrote:Most bikes have a 0-60 (Close enough to 0 - 100km/h to not make a difference) of around 3 seconds... give or take.

Jase, figures from Stereo are in MILES per hour, bit of a diff b/n 60kmh and 60mph I suggest.

aardvark · Post by **aardvark** » Fri Feb 03, 2006 10:15 am

mick_dundee wrote:
aardvark wrote:Most bikes have a 0-60 (Close enough to 0 - 100km/h to not make a difference) of around 3 seconds... give or take.
Jase, figures from Stereo are in MILES per hour, bit of a diff b/n 60kmh and 60mph I suggest.

Errr, yeah, right. And?

Hence the reason I said "0-60 (Close enought to 0-100)"

60mph is 96.56kmh. Most bikes do the 0-100km/h or 0-60mph in around 3 secons. Some slightly less, some slightly more.

hidepenny · Post by **hidepenny** » Fri Feb 03, 2006 11:07 am

Most bikes have a 0-60 (Close enough to 0 - 100km/h to not make a difference) of around 3 seconds...

definitely not my bike

even it was 0-60kph

Gosling1 · Post by **Gosling1** » Fri Feb 03, 2006 4:53 pm

Stereo wrote:Not many bikes have a top speed of 205 MILES per hour

*rubs belly*.....* gazes out window at ZX12R*.....*rubs belly*

sneakypete · Post by **sneakypete** » Sat Feb 04, 2006 7:48 am

neka79 wrote:
cambo: version 2 wrote:u have no idea what i would do for a chance to drive one of them...... nice ride
blow your own trumpet??

if i could do that, i wouldn't have gotten married!!!!

Neka79 · Post by **Neka79** » Sat Feb 04, 2006 10:39 am

Stereo wrote:Not many bikes have a top speed of 205 MILES per hour

yea..but not many bikes cost $500,000 either...
and for the top speed difference (my blade does 290)....the $485000 DIFFERENCE IS...WELL U FIGURE IT OUT...

ZX10R King · Post by **ZX10R King** » Sat Feb 04, 2006 10:42 am

neka79 wrote:
Stereo wrote:Not many bikes have a top speed of 205 MILES per hour
yea..but not many bikes cost $500,000 either...
and for the top speed difference (my blade does 290)....the $485000 DIFFERENCE IS...WELL U FIGURE IT OUT...

Also, don't forget fuel economy. In something like the Lambo, u give it a thrashing and u r lucky to get 4km/l. Even when ya thrash a bike, ya gotta get atleast twice that?