
I liked that picture, but I had to pay for $100 it....bugger!

Aim achieved, then, since you're managing to sound like a judgemental fucktard instead.Shifty wrote:I don't mean to sound controversial,
If he's in Sydney, then he has no shortage of three-lanes-each-way dual carriageways through industrial areas along which to achieve this.but 200km/h in a 60km/h zone?
You'd imagine that based on what, exactly?if you hadn't said it was a cold night I'd imagine you're the kind of turkey who would have been doing it in shorts and a t-shirt too.
No. The kinds of people who cause ridiculous laws to be implemented are presumptious crybabies who whinge from the sidelines and complain to lawmakers about things they heard about from third-hand accounts...YOU are the kind of person that causes ridiculous laws to be implemented.
Know both him and a number of people who've crashed doing 200 through 60 zones and died, do you? You must, otherwise you'd just be talking out of your arse here, wouldn't you be?People like you crash at 200km/h in a 60km/h zone and get dead,
...and these more suitable times and places would be...where and when, exactly?while those of us who save shenanigans for a more suitable time and place
Is that sentence structure supposed to imply that, somehow, ratbag riders are exempt from these oppressive road rules and adverse press? If that's the case, problem solved, isn't it?get strict motorcycle exhaust laws, 50km/h zones and anti-motorcycle press.
No speed limits anywhere? What a dumb idea...I'm all for abolishing speed limits,
How does he do that? By being stopped by the cops in incidents which, due to no action being taken, will disappear without trace?but people like you demonstrate why it will never happen.
I agree with Colette; and a lot of this email-rage is clearly "unasseptuble" too!Colette wrote:Mile636, go and stand on the naughty mat *points*