min requirements

General Discussion
User avatar
Rossi
KSRC Contributor
KSRC Contributor
Posts: 1656
Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 12:39 am
Bike: ZX9R
State: Victoria
Location: Vic : Epping

Re: min requirements

Post by Rossi »

tim wrote: I just went through my Ls and Ps and no one would reasonably know anymore than what I've learnt over the last few months, so I can't imagine it's fair or reasonable to get charged for it.

No such thing as "fair & reasonable" in the eyes of the law.......... ignorance of the law is NOT an excuse
I don't suffer from insanity; I enjoy every minute of it.
User avatar
photomike666
Apprentice Post Whore :-)
Apprentice Post Whore :-)
Posts: 5956
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 12:01 am
Bike: ZX10R
State: Victoria
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Re: min requirements

Post by photomike666 »

Helmet approved under Aus standards and underwear to abibe by common decency laws.

If the law were to force you to wear any other clothing it would have to have an Australian standard - and non exists for any 'protective" motorcycle clothing other than helmets WORLDWIDE.

PLEASE NOTE - in some cases common decency may require more than just underwear :shock:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
07 ZX10R since new, tracky TBA, KX450F, 87 CR250 restoration, GT MTB - I've got serious thrill issues, dude
User avatar
mike-s
Apprentice Post Whore :-)
Apprentice Post Whore :-)
Posts: 6142
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 5:43 am
Bike: Suzuki
State: New South Wales
Location: Arncliffe, Sydney
Contact:

Re: min requirements

Post by mike-s »

doesn't explain all the showoffs on their R1's and gixxer thou's wearing wifebeaters, boardies and thongs and the obligatory helmet in summer.
Image
If it hurts, you aren't doing it right.
User avatar
Saki
KSRC Contributor
KSRC Contributor
Posts: 2167
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 5:59 pm
Bike: ZX10R
State: Western Australia

Re: min requirements

Post by Saki »

I was aware that it was simply just a helmet. I am forever seeing Bro's in t-shirts and thongs up here!
ZX-2R '88 -> ZX636 '06 -> ZX-9R '99 -> ZX-10R '04 -> Z1000 '03 -> ZX-10R '04 -> ZX-10R '08
User avatar
dutchy
KSRC Contributor
KSRC Contributor
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:31 am
Bike: ZX7R
State: Victoria
Location: Vic

Re: min requirements

Post by dutchy »

You must wear a minimum sandshoes, sunnies, and budgie smugglers!
Attachments
squid.jpg
squid.jpg (69.14 KiB) Viewed 1118 times
I plan on living forever..............so far so good!!
Self appointed official poon-tang image supplier to KSRC
2010 KSRC MotoGP tipping champion

1998 ZX7R
1982 GPZ 550
User avatar
dutchy
KSRC Contributor
KSRC Contributor
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:31 am
Bike: ZX7R
State: Victoria
Location: Vic

Re: min requirements

Post by dutchy »

Oh and i call BS. Helmets the only thing stipulated by law, aren't they. otherwise all bike gear would have to be rated to meet an australians standard that would enure our safety on the road and then would probably cost us more money. maybe even another charge added to our regos to cover the differance to bring this new saftey incentive in??? :x
I plan on living forever..............so far so good!!
Self appointed official poon-tang image supplier to KSRC
2010 KSRC MotoGP tipping champion

1998 ZX7R
1982 GPZ 550
User avatar
corvus2606
KSRC Member
KSRC Member
Posts: 254
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 11:09 am
Bike: ER5
State: ACT

Re: min requirements

Post by corvus2606 »

or they could just make it that it has to be CE approved, which is already done for heaps of gear out there, and there wouldnt need to be any price increase.

just like helmets, australia wouldnt introduce a standard, they would use another countries instead
2002 GPX250 - Gone
2003 ER-5 - Gone
1986 GPZ1000rx - Under Construction
Ultramarine
Newbie
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 12:45 pm
Bike: ZZR250
State: New South Wales
Location: Liverpool, NSW

Re: min requirements

Post by Ultramarine »

Take it from someone in the job, you can't book a bike rider for wearing shorts. The ONLY requirement is a helmet that complies with the australian safety standards and is displaying the sticker. It is an offence to remove the sticker. I have no idea what offence they would have written on the ticket, I only hope the guy didn't pay it and contested it at court.

As a side note it should be mentioned that you don't actually have to know you are committing a traffic offence to be infringed. Traffic offences carry whats known as 'strict liability' which differs from criminal offences.
Post Reply