Sig Pics - Sizing - please read

Post by **MadKaw** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:08 pm

Please check your sig pic size...

From the Forum Guidelines..

Sig pics
Also, if would like a sig pic under your post please keep the size to about 500 w x 80 h pixels and as small a bytes as possible - under 30,000 would be good. We don't want the sigs bigger than the posts.!
If you want KSRC to host it, please send your sig pic to Dan for uploading.

Members who do not comply with the above may have ther sig removed.!

Post by **robracer** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:12 pm

Sig natzi

Glen · Post by **Glen** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:26 pm

Sorry

I'll fix it right away.

Stace · Post by **Stace** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:41 pm

Bloody hell Dave, Mine better be ok, after all it was your doing remember.

hoffy · Post by **hoffy** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:43 pm

Is Mine OK

Post by **robracer** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:47 pm

hoffy wrote:Is Mine OK

Square Hoffy!.... thats cool, right click to get the properties & all will be revealed mate

Glen · Post by **Glen** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:53 pm

hoffy wrote:Is Mine OK

Yeah but theres some big black and gold thing blocking the scenery

Post by **MadKaw** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:16 pm

Glen wrote:
hoffy wrote:Is Mine OK
Yeah but theres some big black and gold thing blocking the scenery

The scenery looks to be moving faster though.....

and Stace, yours is OK, it had to be a little bigger to fit all that detail in...

Stace · Post by **Stace** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:18 pm

MadKaw wrote: Stace, yours is OK, it had to be a little bigger to fit all that detail in...

I deserved that i guess

Duane · Post by **Duane** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:20 pm

Dear Admin,

I currently have in my possession a picture of Stace eating poo he found on the ground at Phillip Island.

Can a exemption be made so I can have this image at 800x600 pixels as my signature?

My concern is that if you reduce the size any further than 800x600 you lose the detail that stace is indeed eating poo.

Honestly concerned,

Duane

Stace · Post by **Stace** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:28 pm

IT WAS RUBBER!!!!

Anyway, We're off topic

MickLC · Post by **MickLC** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:51 pm

Stace wrote:IT WAS RUBBER!!!!....

We call them condoms here, and why were you eating one full of poo?

photomike666 · Post by **photomike666** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:01 pm

Stace wrote:Bloody hell Dave, Mine better be ok, after all it was your doing remember.

Oops, apparently, yours is too fat

Stace · Post by **Stace** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:03 pm

Can we stay on topic here??? Show some respect to Dave you guys. Bloody hell, Anyway, back to you Dave

red_dave · Post by **red_dave** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:38 pm

Stace wrote:Can we stay on topic here??? Show some respect to Dave you guys. Bloody hell, Anyway, back to you Dave

Thanks Mate... I appreciate it...

http://www.ksrc-au.com/duane/ic/images/gfx_178.jpg

You did mean me didn't you?