I won't buy into this as mine (and 2 others with similar mods) put out about 155 on the dyno. We had no PC's though but I struggle to think that would make much difference with slip ons and its proven there is no gains with a K&N...
Anyway, HP is actually torque (ft lbs) x revs divided by 5252. The torque and HP graphs should always cross at 5252 rpm. The first dyno sheet looks OK based on this, but the second dyno sheet looks like the torque is reading a little high.
The 10 was set free on the dyno!
-
MadKaw
- Administrator
- Posts: 9671
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 4:33 pm
- Bike: ZX10R
- State: New South Wales
- Location: Windsor or the Creek..
- Contact:
Last edited by MadKaw on Tue Jan 30, 2007 12:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Dave
2010 Z1000
ex bikes
05 ZX-10R Race Bike - No.77
95 ZXR750R M Race Bike - No. 75
98 ZX9R Race Bike - No. 000
zx6r, zx7r, GPX750, GPX500, lots of KX's.
I ride way too fast to worry about cholesterol
2010 Z1000
ex bikes
05 ZX-10R Race Bike - No.77
95 ZXR750R M Race Bike - No. 75
98 ZX9R Race Bike - No. 000
zx6r, zx7r, GPX750, GPX500, lots of KX's.
I ride way too fast to worry about cholesterol
-
MadKaw
- Administrator
- Posts: 9671
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 4:33 pm
- Bike: ZX10R
- State: New South Wales
- Location: Windsor or the Creek..
- Contact:
Yep, I'd say the fact that the 2nd dyno is in Nm may be why the torque reads higher.. the conversion makes em similar.
Power kW = (Torque (Nm) x RPM)/9549.3
Power HP = (Torque (ft/lbs) x RPM)/5252.1
1ft-lbs = 1.36 Nm
1HP = .75 KW
Power kW = (Torque (Nm) x RPM)/9549.3
Power HP = (Torque (ft/lbs) x RPM)/5252.1
1ft-lbs = 1.36 Nm
1HP = .75 KW
Dave
2010 Z1000
ex bikes
05 ZX-10R Race Bike - No.77
95 ZXR750R M Race Bike - No. 75
98 ZX9R Race Bike - No. 000
zx6r, zx7r, GPX750, GPX500, lots of KX's.
I ride way too fast to worry about cholesterol
2010 Z1000
ex bikes
05 ZX-10R Race Bike - No.77
95 ZXR750R M Race Bike - No. 75
98 ZX9R Race Bike - No. 000
zx6r, zx7r, GPX750, GPX500, lots of KX's.
I ride way too fast to worry about cholesterol
-
YAPPA
- KSRC Regular
- Posts: 928
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 8:30 pm
- Bike: ZX6R
- State: Queensland
- Location: BRISSY
Who's a smartypants thenMadKaw wrote:Yep, I'd say the fact that the 2nd dyno is in Nm may be why the torque reads higher.. the conversion makes em similar.
Power kW = (Torque (Nm) x RPM)/9549.3
Power HP = (Torque (ft/lbs) x RPM)/5252.1
1ft-lbs = 1.36 Nm
1HP = .75 KW
If it starts goes well & can fry a rear tyre it's all good fellas......as Neka would say" Just launch tha carn't!!!!!"
-
MadKaw
- Administrator
- Posts: 9671
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 4:33 pm
- Bike: ZX10R
- State: New South Wales
- Location: Windsor or the Creek..
- Contact:
Yes but its too big.. Forum rules state sig pics must be under 90 pixels high.. I better delete it.Wattie wrote:on topic is too complicated for me...
SO....
Paz, thats a farrrkin good pic in your sig...
and Farrrk i need a 10!
and faaark you guys are GEEKS!
and we're not geeks, just informed....
Dave
2010 Z1000
ex bikes
05 ZX-10R Race Bike - No.77
95 ZXR750R M Race Bike - No. 75
98 ZX9R Race Bike - No. 000
zx6r, zx7r, GPX750, GPX500, lots of KX's.
I ride way too fast to worry about cholesterol
2010 Z1000
ex bikes
05 ZX-10R Race Bike - No.77
95 ZXR750R M Race Bike - No. 75
98 ZX9R Race Bike - No. 000
zx6r, zx7r, GPX750, GPX500, lots of KX's.
I ride way too fast to worry about cholesterol
