Shifty wrote:As for "allroundability" the 9r has no equal
Now, I haven't ridden a ZX9R but I had a good stint on a VFR800 yesterday and I have to say that they're furgin awesome - the only thing that bothered me was the VTEC kick but a Power Commander would soon fix that.
You reckon?
That kick comes from the motor doubling its valve curtain, not the usual emissions dip into lean running.
Interested in opinions from people who aren't one-eyed and have ridden both?
I've only ridden a couple of Klingon VFR's, no VTEC ones, and it's easy to see why so many people are so devoted to them. Compared to a ZX9, the only comfort advantage they have is the (much) narrower tank, but, for me, that's offset by the higher bars, which make it more difficult to slouch right down onto the tank.
Engine-wise, the VFR's got more character, but the ZX9 simply pisses all over it in terms of outright performance right through the rev range.
The VFR's probably got the more intrinsically capable chassis owing, again, to it being so narrow, but it's hobbled by being typically-Honda tail-heavy, hung on pretty unsophisticated suspension and retarded by those linked brakes, in contrast to the ZX9 on all three counts.
The ZX9's a cushy sportsbike, the VFR a very sporty sportstourer. Provided you can put up with how wide the ZX9 splays your knees, you get more motor, more suspension and more brakes than on the Honda.