Yenzarill wrote:Well, that is what I thought, but the assessor guy said that because it wasn't my policy, all they did was a cash settlement.
To be fair, this assessor sounds like true to type; wouldn't know a bike if he tripped over one.
From an insurance standpoint, *ANY* damage to the frame and the frame's a bin job, to be replaced with a brad-spanker from the factory. Further, any kind of scuffing to any metal component, like a lever, or the bottom of a forkleg, or the swingarm, and that part's supposed to be replaced, too.
I still remember one particular cream-cheese bagel who tried to make out like you could fill and buff out gouges taken out of a clutch perch; it ain't a front guard on a VK Commodore, mate.
So how can they justify taking away my bike?
By paying for it. They give you a sum equal to an agreed value for the bike in its pre-accident condition, and they get to keep the wreck. But until a sttlement is agreed on, what's left of the bike is yours.
Alternately, you agree on what's called a salvage value for the wreck, and you get to keep the wreck plus a payout equal to the agreed value for the bike minus the salvage value.
I'm not sure. No expert on the subject. I'm just anxiously waiting to hear back from the guy to find out what's happening.

OK... I've been led on this particular merry dance four times now, most recently when my R1 got wiped out in a 70kph rear-ender.
Guy came around. He had just as little clue about bikes as your guy did. Despite there being a hole in the crankcases, the subframe looking like it had been ambushed on the road to Baghdad airport by cahns firing rocket-propelled grenades and yelling "Allahu akhbar!", the tank being actually ripped open and so on, he reckoned the bike's salvage value was four grand, while replacement value was nine grand, because, at that time, you could get brand-new R1's for 14.5 grand.
I told him to get fucked and to get the fuck off my front lawn, in so many words, and that next time, I expected to deal with someone who has a clue. I then instructed my lawyer to quibble with them over the $3500 or so in go-fast bits I had on the bike (Akrapovic pipe, Pen$ke rear shock, Over rearsets, steeering damper, partridge in a pear tree...). In the meantime, I sold the wreck to a mate, who wrote me a receipt for $750. Metaphorically, I slapped this on the insurance company's desk and, after a few more rounds of offer-rejection-counteroffer-getfugged and so on, I got a semi-decent payout. Still nothing like what the bike was worth to me, but a hell of a lot better than their initial offer of $5000.
My immediate advice to you would be to cash in the rego (add the cancellation fee to your claim) because, whatever else happens, this matter isn't going to be resolved in any kind of hurry; trust me on that. Then, have a chat to a lawyer who specialises in traffic matters (they advertise in bikemags, and most will have an informal chat with you, advising you to do something similar to what I just did). You might even consider engaging the services of one. Your costs can be tacked on to the rest of your claim (the other guy's insurance company will typically pick up about 70-75% of your legal costs), and insurance companies have this way of being a lot more compliant when it's a law firm's letterhead on your correspondence to them.
I could prattle on. Any more questions, feel free to send me a private message... in fact, I would insist that you do. I've had insurance companies try to screw me over, and I've watched them succeed in screwing over mates and family, so I take their ploys and plays personally. If there's something I can do to ensure a regular person doesn't get jacked, I'll do it.
Seriously, mate. Fire away.