kawasaki250 wrote:ok guys another quick question,
i have been looking iinto this further,
now something thats getting to me and making me think alot about is what would be better on fuel economy....
a mitsubishi express 2.4ltr EFI petrol
ford econovan 1.8ltr (pre 2000) 2.0ltr (post 2000) carbyd petrol.
toyota hiace 2.4ltr petrol carby.
lols. any help appreciated. would love a turbo diesel but cant fork out the $$ upfront for one

have driven just about every van under the sun in the last 20 years
late 90's mits had the same efi 2.4 , only 50 litre tank and about 15L/100k
hiace is the pick of any vans, you pay more buy a good one and you will always sell it
and relatively good on fuel
ok forget the ford tragic , pos
had one in about 2004 short one TDI ,
in that time it did the fly by wire pedal box so you couldnt drive it
it went to ford they said it was fixed , it made it about 1k from the dealer before it went back again
door locks replaced, including a trip in the panel shop to get the door fixed when the monkeys damaged
it replacing the door lok
it kept stalling so put into ford, they sent to a diesel specialist who pulled the fuel pump apart and said fuel pump worn due to
crap fuel , no warranty coverage $5K bill
which leaves the 'ECONOvan' economy in name alone, had 1 as a loaner while the tragic was in getting done
the fuel tank is 63 litres which will get you precisely 324k which is about 1k short of the petrol station
