I emailed the Minister about why Qld uses Speed camera's
Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 9:50 pm
Re: Speed Cameras
Thank you for your email of 4 January 2006 to the Honourable Paul Lucas MP, Minister for Transport and Main Roads about speed cameras. The Minister has asked that I respond on his behalf.
Queensland Transport (QT) and the Queensland Police Service (QPS) believe that there is no such thing as safe speeding. As a result, travelling above the posted speed limit is illegal in Queensland. Excessive speed is a major contributing factor in approximately 17% of fatal crashes each year in Queensland. Speeding also contributes to numerous crashes involving serious injury and increases the severity of crashes caused by other factors. Drivers who are speeding are undertaking an illegal activity and it is for this reason that enforcement is undertaken, not for the purpose of revenue raising.
QT and the QPS are committed to reducing speed and improving safety on Queensland roads. One of the essential elements to reducing speed is enforcement. The speed camera program is a key, effective enforcement activity. The program works on an anywhere, anytime, overt operating procedure. This overt method of operation involves the placement of signs noting that speed cameras are in use, the approval of speed camera zones at locations where there is a proven crash history or speed problem and the random deployment of speed cameras. I am advised that the overt operating procedure results in a greater deterrence rate as motorists are continually reminded to slow down and obey the posted speed limit.
You may be interested to know that the Queensland speed camera program has been evaluated by the Monash University Accident Research Centre (MUARC). An independent assessment of the effects of the Queensland speed camera program in terms of crash savings has been published and is available on the web.
(http://general.monash.edu/muarc/).
I am advised that the latest evaluation results of the speed camera program indicate that the estimated number of serious casualty crashes prevented by the speed camera program (within 2km of the centre of speed camera zones) in 2004 was 2,243. Further, the estimated total social cost savings for the same period was $1.317 billion. These results prove the worth of this valuable road safety program.
In relation to the money collected from speed camera infringements, you may be interested to know that the distribution of fines from camera detected offences (speed and red light) is governed by the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995. Under this Act all money collected for camera detected offences (in excess of administrative costs of collection) must be used to fund road safety education and awareness projects, road accident injury rehabilitation programs and safety improvements to state-controlled roads.
If you would like any further information, please call Ms Debbie Tattersall from QT's Land Transport and Safety Division on 3253 5855, who will be pleased to assist you.
Yours sincerely
KATRINA WOTTON
Senior Policy Advisor
Thank you for your email of 4 January 2006 to the Honourable Paul Lucas MP, Minister for Transport and Main Roads about speed cameras. The Minister has asked that I respond on his behalf.
Queensland Transport (QT) and the Queensland Police Service (QPS) believe that there is no such thing as safe speeding. As a result, travelling above the posted speed limit is illegal in Queensland. Excessive speed is a major contributing factor in approximately 17% of fatal crashes each year in Queensland. Speeding also contributes to numerous crashes involving serious injury and increases the severity of crashes caused by other factors. Drivers who are speeding are undertaking an illegal activity and it is for this reason that enforcement is undertaken, not for the purpose of revenue raising.
QT and the QPS are committed to reducing speed and improving safety on Queensland roads. One of the essential elements to reducing speed is enforcement. The speed camera program is a key, effective enforcement activity. The program works on an anywhere, anytime, overt operating procedure. This overt method of operation involves the placement of signs noting that speed cameras are in use, the approval of speed camera zones at locations where there is a proven crash history or speed problem and the random deployment of speed cameras. I am advised that the overt operating procedure results in a greater deterrence rate as motorists are continually reminded to slow down and obey the posted speed limit.
You may be interested to know that the Queensland speed camera program has been evaluated by the Monash University Accident Research Centre (MUARC). An independent assessment of the effects of the Queensland speed camera program in terms of crash savings has been published and is available on the web.
(http://general.monash.edu/muarc/).
I am advised that the latest evaluation results of the speed camera program indicate that the estimated number of serious casualty crashes prevented by the speed camera program (within 2km of the centre of speed camera zones) in 2004 was 2,243. Further, the estimated total social cost savings for the same period was $1.317 billion. These results prove the worth of this valuable road safety program.
In relation to the money collected from speed camera infringements, you may be interested to know that the distribution of fines from camera detected offences (speed and red light) is governed by the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995. Under this Act all money collected for camera detected offences (in excess of administrative costs of collection) must be used to fund road safety education and awareness projects, road accident injury rehabilitation programs and safety improvements to state-controlled roads.
If you would like any further information, please call Ms Debbie Tattersall from QT's Land Transport and Safety Division on 3253 5855, who will be pleased to assist you.
Yours sincerely
KATRINA WOTTON
Senior Policy Advisor