

the kid wrote:But remember one thing , Dave #3 watches videos of rampant Circus Ponies every time Cath goes down the street shopping so dont listen to anything he says .
POLICE...dutchy wrote:I'm glad it got stopped. It's a shame that nearly any thread that has "police" in the title nearly always degenerates into everyone arguing their opinions on speeding. It's a relevant topic no doubt, but the same main themes seem to get repeated over and over again.
But there not cement!!!!Bogan wrote:Man I've been away all week, if I was here earlier I might have been able to nip this in the bud. Help yourselves people...
What are you talking about?dutchy wrote:It's a relevant topic no doubt, but the same main themes seem to get repeated over and over again.
I think this is poor form "Little trick i use to annoy people, plus the harder it is to read the longer it takes to respond." if the typing is simply to antagonize then that is wrong. Personally I thought you were hard done by some in the other thread and I in the main agree with your comments but admitting the above shows you in bad light and really takes credibility away, but hey that is just my opinion.QWAKA wrote:Finally someone has noticed no paragraphs,Duane wrote:I don't know why everyone has an issue with QWAKA, everytime I read one of his posts I get to where the first paragraph should be and zone out...![]()
Little trick i use to annoy people, plus the harder it is to read the longer it takes to respond.
Sorry if i you find my opinion boringnow that i have been found out i will stop the continuous lines...........dam you.
It usually only takes most people 2 or 3 post's to figure it out and pull me up on it. Half of the comments on the thread were made to antagonize me, i dont think i was hard done by at all. So please no pity required, as for credibility i dont think i have it anyway so no loss thereNaked Twin wrote:I think this is poor form "Little trick i use to annoy people, plus the harder it is to read the longer it takes to respond." if the typing is simply to antagonize then that is wrong. Personally I thought you were hard done by some in the other thread and I in the main agree with your comments but admitting the above shows you in bad light and really takes credibility away, but hey that is just my opinion.QWAKA wrote:Finally someone has noticed no paragraphs,Duane wrote:I don't know why everyone has an issue with QWAKA, everytime I read one of his posts I get to where the first paragraph should be and zone out...![]()
Little trick i use to annoy people, plus the harder it is to read the longer it takes to respond.
Sorry if i you find my opinion boringnow that i have been found out i will stop the continuous lines...........dam you.
On topic, it is quite simple. We don't pay to play here, it isn't a club where you get to vote who runs it. Madkaw opens his house at Christmas for all and sundry, again on the house so if he thinks Ivan Milat should be a moderator suck it up. I think I can say that Aardvark and I haven't walked the same side of the street but I have always thought he was pretty fair.
As they say if you don't like the rules grab your bat and ball and go. Personally I hope that doesn't happen as I come here for the banter I see and the bike topics, I don't have a kwaka anymore but still find it enjoyable.