lotii10396 wrote:What makes a good safe rider? With my newly found insight I suggest it is something like:
60% rider, 30% skill & experience + 10% machinery. (ie rider component = 2x s&e + more than 1/2 of the whole equation)
A clearer description is:
60% rider attitude, 30% rider skill & experience + 10% machinery
Good and safe are not the same thing. I've seen plenty of good riders, way better riders than I, do some incredibly unsafe things on a bike. I've seen one or two extremely safe riders who aren't particularly good riders. I guess I'd define "good" as skill, and "safe" as well within their ability, with a mind to the environment (i.e, safe on a motorway, safe on the twisties, and safe on a track are all completely different things)
I'd agree with you that attitude is important, but it's also pretty vague. What I define as a good riding attitude may be miles away from what others define it as. And how do you define experience? Is it years of riding? Kms of riding? Time riding in various situations? Again - it's highly variable.
I think you're over thinking it. Yes, attitude is important. Skill is important. Experience is important. Having a well maintained vehicle that operates correctly is important. But how to rank them? There are many different and valid approaches. If you weigh good higher than safe, then you might weight skill higher than attitude. Or you might weigh experience higher than attitude, because you define 'good' differently. If you weigh safe higher than good, you may weigh machinery and attitude higher than experience. So many variables!