Pretty sure they are. The first were built late 95 (mine is 12/95) and hence qualifies as the series is based on build date on the chassis.Godzilla wrote:
By the way, ZX7R's are not eligible.
Time to decide whether I have a crack at this thing
Strika wrote:Just so's we don't allow too much emotion to cloud our judgement I maight just share some stats with you...........
1993 ZX750- L1. Measured at the time @ 100RWHP(that's an absolute knacker shatterer that example as most didn't make this much) weight 205 (I'm being kind here too it's more like 215) equates to a power to weight ratio of @ 2.05 kgs/HP yeah????
1995 ZX6R-F1. Measured at the time @ 92 RWHP (thats a dud most made more) and weighing in at a spritely 185kgs, equates to a power to weight ratio of 2.01kg/hp Yeah????
You're kidding right???? Believe what you want to believe, but a stock ZXR will never lap a track as quick as a stock ZX6 with the same competent rider on board.ZXR750 wrote:Strika wrote:Just so's we don't allow too much emotion to cloud our judgement I maight just share some stats with you...........
1993 ZX750- L1. Measured at the time @ 100RWHP(that's an absolute knacker shatterer that example as most didn't make this much) weight 205 (I'm being kind here too it's more like 215) equates to a power to weight ratio of @ 2.05 kgs/HP yeah????
1995 ZX6R-F1. Measured at the time @ 92 RWHP (thats a dud most made more) and weighing in at a spritely 185kgs, equates to a power to weight ratio of 2.01kg/hp Yeah????
I thought you weren't going to let emotion cloud your judgement. Your article was written with a just a touch of bias. You also forgot to mention the torque variances. This should put the ZXR ahead of the ZX6. Especially for the larger gent. The ZXR also came out as a ZXRR the 600 never did until the 636.