Qtr mile times?

I-K · Post by **I-K** » Sat Dec 31, 2005 11:28 am

Wattie wrote:z1000s are quite a bit de-tuned, cams, crank, heads. about 20-30HP down...

When they tested one in their Green Issue from a year ago, Performance Bikes got 123bhp out of a Z1000 on a dyno. When they did the big-bore group test in 2002, the ZX-9R-F1P they had on test laid down 118bhp.

They use the more conservative DIN correction factor, but the relative figures are telling.

SideShow · Post by **SideShow** » Sat Dec 31, 2005 11:35 am

SocialSecurity wrote:would love to see a near stock 9R run a 9 second pass here in australia... with a human rider too, not one of those drag racing robots that all the american magazines have working for them

Yep, you got that one right. All the US magazines never give honest reviews either, I guess they figure in the advertising they lose factor.

Post by **Wattie** » Sun Jan 01, 2006 6:01 pm

I-K wrote:
Wattie wrote:z1000s are quite a bit de-tuned, cams, crank, heads. about 20-30HP down...

When they tested one in their Green Issue from a year ago, Performance Bikes got 123bhp out of a Z1000 on a dyno. When they did the big-bore group test in 2002, the ZX-9R-F1P they had on test laid down 118bhp.

They use the more conservative DIN correction factor, but the relative figures are telling.

so my bike aint as slow as i thought it was hehe

SocialSecurity · Post by **SocialSecurity** » Sun Jan 01, 2006 7:36 pm

I-K wrote:
Wattie wrote:z1000s are quite a bit de-tuned, cams, crank, heads. about 20-30HP down...

When they tested one in their Green Issue from a year ago, Performance Bikes got 123bhp out of a Z1000 on a dyno. When they did the big-bore group test in 2002, the ZX-9R-F1P they had on test laid down 118bhp.

They use the more conservative DIN correction factor, but the relative figures are telling.

not much point comparing different dyno figures recorded on different days (was it even the same dyno?)

plenty of reviewers get around 125-130rwhp for stock ZX9R's, such as this or this or this. Also the 1/4 mile figures here, regardless of optimistic ET's, show ZX9R trap speeds to be fairly consistant mid/high 130's, but the Z1000 trapping in the mid 120's... and also being about 30lbs heavier for wet weight

Post by **Wattie** » Sun Jan 01, 2006 9:01 pm

quite true, as my speeds were all in the 120s

Post by **Wattie** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 4:36 pm

last night i ran an 11.1 @ 122mph

a zx10 ther did a few 10.2's with akro pipe and lowered and geariing changes.

SocialSecurity · Post by **SocialSecurity** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 5:04 pm

wattie, can you post up your time slip? or just the details, like 60', r/t, 1/8 mile time/speed etc

cheers

kypez · Post by **kypez** » Fri Jan 06, 2006 5:28 am

mate ran a 10.4 on his bussa while I could only compete with a modest 10.6 @ 135mph (or was it 134?!). Did crap times after that. dont think weighing in at 110 kilos helped my cause... but next time at 95, the front was too light, keeping me consistant in the 11.0XX @ 130.X mph

Funny part there was my 60' time was 2.000 seconds. While the other runs I had at 10.8 were 1.8 60' times... the 10R is to eager to lift...

The zx9 was the first production bike that broke the 10 second 1/4 mile (if memory serves me right) stock...

It all depends on the rider, temp, air desity, fuel... hmmm... quite a few factors come to think of it...

SideShow · Post by **SideShow** » Fri Jan 06, 2006 5:31 am

Has anyone raced a 10R with the swingarm extensions?

SocialSecurity · Post by **SocialSecurity** » Fri Jan 06, 2006 9:14 am

the 9 is no 9 second production bike IMO. it doesnt count if you strap it down, lower the rear and get about 3 runs to a clutch. that just american magazines for ya

SideShow · Post by **SideShow** » Fri Jan 06, 2006 11:37 am

SocialSecurity wrote:would love to see a near stock 9R run a 9 second pass here in australia... with a human rider too, not one of those drag racing robots that all the american magazines have working for them

SocialSecurity wrote:the 9 is no 9 second production bike IMO. it doesnt count if you strap it down, lower the rear and get about 3 runs to a clutch. that just american magazines for ya

US,,,,were super human drag racers...... :lol:

Check out these numbers

http://sportrider.com/bikes/146_perf_nums/

SocialSecurity · Post by **SocialSecurity** » Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:36 pm

yeah ive seen em, and ive heard plenty about sportrider strapping/lowering bikes and burning out clutches to get those times...

to me its just cheating to run the bike down the 1/4 in a setup thats far from ideal on the road, unless its a dedicated drag bike

i prefer the times from this american magazine:

http://3e-lab.com/blog/10/09/other/bike ... ne-article

10.2 @ 145mph sounds more likely (for a ZX10R not a ZX9R) with a track/road setup

tho i know a guy who ran 9.98 @ 144mph on his bone stock 04 R1 on a stinking hot day.. but hes pretty light and can ride damn well

Post by **Wattie** » Tue Jan 10, 2006 1:32 pm

SocialSecurity wrote:wattie, can you post up your time slip? or just the details, like 60', r/t, 1/8 mile time/speed etc

cheers

as requested

R/T .047 yeah baby!!
60' 1.838
330' 4.789
660' 7.211
mph 101.7
1000' 9.331
ET 11.154
mph 122.21
k/mh 196.68

and some fuel for the fire :lol:

i ran next to a zx10 with Akra, shorter gearing, and strapped front

his were
60' 1.781
330' 4.514
660' 6.704
mph 111.56
1000' 8.611
ET 10.245
mph 137.69
and afterwards informs me he used to go better with his 1st clutch

Post by **Wattie** » Tue Jan 10, 2006 1:34 pm

is the 8th mile the 660 foot time?? im not imperial trained...

SocialSecurity · Post by **SocialSecurity** » Tue Jan 10, 2006 1:52 pm

yep

nice 60 footer