re: Arista (No cover with 3 claims) Even if your not at faul
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:18 am
I think that "3 strikes and your out" is a load of horseshit, three claims means nothing, 3 claims "at fault" in the last 6 years or so, would be far more reasonable. I've already had 3 claims on cars over the last 4 years, only *ONE* was my fault, everything else was to make 100% sure my car got repaired without hassle after someone else screwed up (thankfully no incidents on the bike.... yet..