stevew_zzr wrote:ProblemChild wrote:all education has to be payed for by someone,even apprenticeships.and not by the tax payer.i actualy agree with hecs especially when there are the number of so called students who only do it to avoid GETTING a JOB

YOu are wrong (edited for mod approval)
Its only * a number* of students referred to here, not *every* student. Every tertiary institution has a handful of *career* students whose only interest in life is remaining in the tertiary education system for as long as humanly possible. We had at least a dozen of these at CCAE when I attended as a student back in the early 80's......they exist at every Uni.
I-K wrote:....Yes, because it's not like doctors, research scientists, engineers and computer programmers don't put anything back into society over the course of their working lives.
And at the start of their working lives, they can put their HECS debt back into society. Anybody in the roles you have described (with the obvious exception being computer programmers *by and large*

) will be earning salaries between 100k and 200k and in a lot of cases far more.
These educated members of society can repay their HECS debt, its not like they can't afford to, is it ??

Shit, for some doctors their entire HECS debt is represented by the the cost of their eldest kids first BMW !!The only reason they get paid such phat salaries is because of their Uni education in the first place.....I don't envy the study required to achieve a Masters Degree in Whatever, I just don't agree that the taxpayer should fund this.
A lot of taxpayers are blue-collar, farmers, etc, no ability to even contemplate study in order to achieve a higher salary.......why should they foot the bill ?
