Compression question

For general Technical and Performance Discussions

Compression question

Postby Colette » Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:26 pm

I'm looking at different bikes and comparing their specs, but one thing I don't understand is compression...

For example, one bike has a compression of 12:0:1 and another is 12:2:1 - what does this mean? :?
User avatar
Colette
Team Cougar
 
Posts: 3089
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 10:20 am
Bike: ZX6R
State: New South Wales

Postby FrogZ » Thu Jun 15, 2006 5:02 pm

Atmospheric pressure is 1
When the valves close and the piston rises the air/fule mixture gets compressed.
The less area left between the piston and the head (squish zone) the higher the compression and the bigger the explosive force.
Also the better the combustion chamber shape and fuel octaine (out of my zone now guys) needed for perfect combustion and maximum explosive force. For example if the sparkplug is shrouded (or hidden) then the flame wont get eerywhere before the piston goes down (poor explaining I know but hey its nearly 5) and all the compression in the world wont help.
The higher the compression, theoretically the more power/bigger bang.

BUT combustion efficency comes into it.
SO pulling the head gasket out of your old BSA and aralditeing the head to the barrel will just blow the base... (or spit the head studs out of your old IT175 ahem ahem)

Old bikes had lower compression for a lot of reasons (poorer fuel, technology etc.)

Did that make sense ?? :oops:
Just because you CAN ride, doesn't mean you SHOULD
FrogZ
KSRC Contributor
KSRC Contributor
 
Posts: 2090
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 12:58 pm
Location: Rockhampton CQ

Postby Colette » Thu Jun 15, 2006 7:31 pm

Thanks Frog, it sortof does...so does that mean the compression that's 12:0:1 is better than the 12:2:1?
User avatar
Colette
Team Cougar
 
Posts: 3089
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 10:20 am
Bike: ZX6R
State: New South Wales

Postby YoungKwakUK » Thu Jun 15, 2006 9:08 pm

Hey! I think 12.2:1 is a higher compression ratio than 12.0:1. Maybe its compressing the misture by 12.2 times rather than just 12 times. As said, higher compression usually = more power so if u mean better as in more powerful, yes 12.2 is better than 12.0 thats if its same engine. obviously an engine with a compression of 12.0:1 could make more power than a different engine with a compression of 12.2:1 due to different design.... hope that helped a bit ! please correct me if im wrong guys, id like to know for sure tooooooooooo
YoungKwakUK
 

Postby Smitty » Thu Jun 15, 2006 10:51 pm

YoungKwakUK wrote:Hey! I think 12.2:1 is a higher compression ratio than 12.0:1. Maybe its compressing the misture by 12.2 times rather than just 12 times. As said, higher compression usually = more power so if u mean better as in more powerful, yes 12.2 is better than 12.0 thats if its same engine. obviously an engine with a compression of 12.0:1 could make more power than a different engine with a compression of 12.2:1 due to different design.... hope that helped a bit ! please correct me if im wrong guys, id like to know for sure tooooooooooo



yeah sorta
compression ratio is only one indication of how much power an engine
will make (you then start with head design, number of valves
camshaft lift, number of carbs etc etc blah blah)

if all else is identical, an engine with a higher compression ratio
should make more power..providing the engines does not
suffer from detonation or preignition due to the higher compression


(oops did I just open a can of worms....? :roll: )
GOTTA LUV the 12R!!
User avatar
Smitty
VIP MEMBER
VIP MEMBER
 
Posts: 10910
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 1:59 pm
Location: 3rd rock from the Sun
Bike: ZX12R
State: Victoria

Postby Rossi » Thu Jun 15, 2006 11:09 pm

Collette........
stop getting technical................pick a bloody colour will ya :lol: :lol:
I don't suffer from insanity; I enjoy every minute of it.
User avatar
Rossi
KSRC Contributor
KSRC Contributor
 
Posts: 1656
Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 12:39 am
Location: Vic : Epping
Bike: ZX9R
State: Victoria

Postby FrogZ » Fri Jun 16, 2006 7:57 am

..and to be quite honest the colour is a DAMN sight more important than the compression ratio....
Just because you CAN ride, doesn't mean you SHOULD
FrogZ
KSRC Contributor
KSRC Contributor
 
Posts: 2090
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 12:58 pm
Location: Rockhampton CQ

Postby Colette » Fri Jun 16, 2006 8:23 am

:lol: yeah ok - was just wanting to know what it meant, that's all :wink:
User avatar
Colette
Team Cougar
 
Posts: 3089
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 10:20 am
Bike: ZX6R
State: New South Wales

Postby Smitty » Fri Jun 16, 2006 11:40 am

Colette wrote::lol: yeah ok - was just wanting to know what it meant, that's all :wink:

go girl...ask as many questions as ya want... :D
GOTTA LUV the 12R!!
User avatar
Smitty
VIP MEMBER
VIP MEMBER
 
Posts: 10910
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 1:59 pm
Location: 3rd rock from the Sun
Bike: ZX12R
State: Victoria

Postby ZX10R King » Fri Jun 16, 2006 11:49 am

Attachments
equation1a.gif
equation1a.gif (737 Bytes) Viewed 3098 times
SXC in black, '05 ZX10R

Image
ZX10R King
KSRC Contributor
KSRC Contributor
 
Posts: 1062
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 5:49 am
Location: Coorparoo, Brisbane

Postby Smitty » Fri Jun 16, 2006 2:02 pm



yep.....

that certainly explains it :twisted:
GOTTA LUV the 12R!!
User avatar
Smitty
VIP MEMBER
VIP MEMBER
 
Posts: 10910
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 1:59 pm
Location: 3rd rock from the Sun
Bike: ZX12R
State: Victoria

Postby mike-s » Fri Jun 16, 2006 2:09 pm

*blink* ohkay ill ignore the formulae there, btw frogs, downsize that sig something, its frickin HUGE.

Colette, in the long run the compression ratio isn't as important as rev range, torque curve, capacity and no of cylinders when it comes to looking at the engine a bike has.

torque = level of pulling power
number of cyl's = whereabouts in the rev range it will pull and how smooth it will operate. 1= anywhere from idle up. 2 = low to mid, but it'll run out of breath higher up. 4, not much down low, more grunt up top until redline. 3, middle of the range between the 2 and the 4, best of both worlds really.

The only time one should worry about the compression ratio is when doing an engine test, 1 atmosphere = 14psi, so a compression test giving 110psi in a 12:1 engine means that it is leaking a lot of air (it should be up about 165psi if not more), (thusly a engine like my gpx has a 11:1 ratio and 140psi would be fine)
Image
If it hurts, you aren't doing it right.
User avatar
mike-s
Apprentice Post Whore :-)
Apprentice Post Whore :-)
 
Posts: 6142
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 5:43 am
Location: Arncliffe, Sydney
Bike: Suzuki
State: New South Wales

Postby jpbikeboy » Sat Jun 17, 2006 10:00 am

To add my 20c worth. Comp ratio is the ratio of volume in the cylinder at bottomdead centre(piston all the way down) compared to the volume at top dead centre(piston all the way up).
eg if you have a volume of 55cc at bottom dead centre and a volume of 5cc at top dead centre- 55/5=11.0. Comp Ratio of 11.0:1
The higher the first number the more compression it has and in theory more power.
You pobably wouldn't feel the difference between 12.2:1 and 12:1.

MAN WE'RE NERDS :lol:
Bikes make the world go round.
jpbikeboy
KSRC Member
KSRC Member
 
Posts: 310
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: sydney

Postby Colette » Sat Jun 17, 2006 1:20 pm

Thanks Josh, that's a very clear explanation, which is what I was after :)

p.s. How's your little bub going? :D
User avatar
Colette
Team Cougar
 
Posts: 3089
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 10:20 am
Bike: ZX6R
State: New South Wales

Postby Duane » Sat Jun 17, 2006 1:49 pm

Compression to me is measured by how much your ring hurts after you rip a fart out.
www.bromancer.com.au
User avatar
Duane
KSRC Addict
KSRC Addict
 
Posts: 3011
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 9:15 am
Location: VIC
Bike: Z1000
State: Victoria

Next

Return to General Tech & Performance Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests