Counter rotating brake rotors!

For general Technical and Performance Discussions

Counter rotating brake rotors!

Postby Strika » Tue Jun 13, 2006 6:48 pm

Check this out. I read about this somewhere recently and just tracked down the website. The theory being that the opposite rotation of the disc counters to some degree the centrifical forces of the wheel and tyre.?? Maybe some of the more analytical souls in here have a more thorough working knowledge of centrifical force and rotating mass as applied to things two wheeled!!! :D

http://www.reverserotatingrotors.com/index.html
"I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity to anyone, but they've always worked for me" Hunter S. Thompson.
There are really only two questions in life. 1.Which way do i go? 2.What is the lap record?
User avatar
Strika
VIP MEMBER
VIP MEMBER
 
Posts: 8373
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 8:02 am
Location: Melbourne
Bike: Yamaha
State: Victoria

Postby Smitty » Tue Jun 13, 2006 8:30 pm

kerrrist...
I just spent 15 minutes reading thru all that....
and the idea might be fine
but geezers..the justification and reasoning is all wrong

the geezer writing all that seems to forget the golden rule....
centrifugal (read gyroscopic) force is stronger the
FURTHER an object is away from the point of rotation and
is stronger the HEAVIER the object is.

so counter rotating discs might be a good idea
but NOT if the wheel and rim is heavy

so lighten up the items furthest from the axle
(tyre and rim) and you do more to overcome the gyroscopic
force he complains about..than counter rotating discs.

things for thought-
why do people chase light weight rims for their bikes?
and if it was a good idea...why not use ONE disc rotor
on all bikes? (problem solved)

my 2c


cheers
GOTTA LUV the 12R!!
User avatar
Smitty
VIP MEMBER
VIP MEMBER
 
Posts: 10910
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 1:59 pm
Location: 3rd rock from the Sun
Bike: ZX12R
State: Victoria

Postby FrogZ » Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:31 am

Surely any advantages would be offset by the extra UNSPRUNG weight to drive it??
Better spending your cash on CF rims I reckon (and look so much more bling :roll: ).
Nice idea but...
Just because you CAN ride, doesn't mean you SHOULD
FrogZ
KSRC Contributor
KSRC Contributor
 
Posts: 2090
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 12:58 pm
Location: Rockhampton CQ

Postby javaman » Wed Jun 14, 2006 12:13 pm

Sounds like a genuine novel idea :D. Would love to try that !

But let's not make things easier to ride than it already is ... takes the fun out things. I heard that Buells are so easy to turn that they're so boring ?
alien.gif andi - Red GPZ900R, GPZ750R1, KLR650 Tengai, KLR250
"my dad's motorbike is cool it is all ways clean.oheter pepole' s motorbikes
are't like my dad's one it's because their is one not always clean."
-ariel circa 2007
http://GPZninja.blogspot.com/
User avatar
javaman
VIP MEMBER
VIP MEMBER
 
Posts: 2473
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 8:39 pm
Location: Bonbeach, VIC
Bike: GPz900
State: Victoria

Postby Smitty » Wed Jun 14, 2006 1:49 pm

javaman wrote:Sounds like a genuine novel idea :D. Would love to try that !

But let's not make things easier to ride than it already is ... takes the fun out things. I heard that Buells are so easy to turn that they're so boring ?



naah Andi
its coz they only have ONE front disc..therefore
according to his theory.... making 'em easier to turn :roll:
GOTTA LUV the 12R!!
User avatar
Smitty
VIP MEMBER
VIP MEMBER
 
Posts: 10910
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 1:59 pm
Location: 3rd rock from the Sun
Bike: ZX12R
State: Victoria

Postby javaman » Wed Jun 14, 2006 2:52 pm

The rationale is not because of one front disc, though. I think the guy created a counter-rotating mass to offset the rim's rotation. Clever, but added weight I think ...
alien.gif andi - Red GPZ900R, GPZ750R1, KLR650 Tengai, KLR250
"my dad's motorbike is cool it is all ways clean.oheter pepole' s motorbikes
are't like my dad's one it's because their is one not always clean."
-ariel circa 2007
http://GPZninja.blogspot.com/
User avatar
javaman
VIP MEMBER
VIP MEMBER
 
Posts: 2473
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 8:39 pm
Location: Bonbeach, VIC
Bike: GPz900
State: Victoria

Postby Neka79 » Fri Jun 16, 2006 11:02 pm

javaman wrote:Sounds like a genuine novel idea :D. Would love to try that !

But let's not make things easier to ride than it already is ... takes the fun out things. I heard that Buells are so easy to turn that they're so boring ?

nah its cos there abt 60hp underpowered for the weight they have that they are boring!!

if these perimeter discs were all the rage, and worked so bloody good..wh yarent they running em on rossi's bike??

my theory has always been- race teams get more $$ to research with than researchers!! so what works for honda/yamaha etc...is good enuf for me..
Neka
2006 Zeddy 1000
1996 VS series 2 S pak Ute
Image
User avatar
Neka79
Extreme Post Whore :-)
Extreme Post Whore :-)
 
Posts: 13115
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 12:20 am
Location: Adelaide......nah its cool..no really!!
Bike: Z900
State: South Australia


Return to General Tech & Performance Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests