Gouging tolls and inappropriate technology, from MCCofNSW
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 1:18 pm
HEADS UP - ALERT FOR ACTION
CIRCULATE this WIDELY
Cashless tolling on the Cross City Tunnel may result in a protest ride when
it opens.
A "Show of Strength" to induce good Television coverage of tolling issues.
To be discussed at next MCC meeting, June 6
Meeting with Minister for Roads this week.
Await outcomes before going crazy, but the outcomes may make us go crazy.
Please digest the following points and communicate them to your members.
Stay Tuned - more in one week.
Failure in transport planning has brought us to this.
* Motorcycles were not considered in traffic plans and have been
forgotten in government negotiations for privately run toll roads.
* This is why motorcycles have been tolled as cars since the 1986
agreement for the Harbour Tunnel pushed up ALL tolls. We just got lost in
the shouting about higher tolls.
* Now we can correct some of the failures to make provisions for
motorcycles.
* Some organisations will resist change, but the facts are very clear,
motorcyclists have been marginalised for years.
* NSW Government holds the contracts for toll roads - it is a policy
issue and hence a voters issue.
Toll rates for motorcycles are too high.
* A family sedan is no more a heavy truck than a motorcycle is a
family sedan.
* Differential toll rates exist between cars and trucks, but not
between cars and motorcycles in NSW.
* One-Quarter of the car rate is the fair and reasonable toll rate for
motorcycles.
* This rational figure is based upon road wear, space occupancy,
congestion and clean air considerations.
* Prescribed toll schedules fail to list motorcycles.
* Motorcycles are an afterthought.
Motorcyclists are happy to pay a toll.
* As long as the toll rate is reasonable AND that we are not charged
extra administrative fees.
E-tags don't work for most motorcycles
* The supplied E-tags are not fit for the purpose sold.
* Check out the 'Terms and Conditions' for the use of E-tags, no
mention of how to use them on motorcycles
* Advertising of E-tags to riders is misleading and fails to disclose
problems
* E-tag is not weatherproof, is affected by vibration and heat
* If it fails due to weather damage, it costs you
* Dangerous to carry upon ones person due to shattering to shards on
impact,
* Cannot be mounted to most motorcycles and hence can't be aimed
correctly at the antenna
* Fails to read due to inability to aim it correctly, hence further
administration costs charged to you
* Riders try to use them, but are forced into unsafe practices, such
as:-
* riding one-handed through the toll plaza, waving the tag until it
changes the taffic light colour
* placing it in a jacket pocket (the casing shatters into shards on
impact and can easily penetrate the body)-
* Using an armband pouch - this places the rider at risk due to
windage rotating the pouch and having it interfere with arm movement and
hence control of the motorcycle - worst on sportsbikes. Too tight causes
numbness. It also defeats the purpose of protective gear, providing a point
impact on the upper arm. These are dangerous
* The MCC of NSW has worked with the RTA and E-tag suppliers and
industrial designers to assist solving the problem
* No suitable E-tag exists anywhere in the world.
Alternative proposals for cashless tolling demand additional fees for not
using an E-tag
* Toll road operators are demanding riders pay for failure to use an
unsuitable E-tag
* The toll road operator expects riders to pay $1.60 per trip for
administration, in addition to the toll
* This is gouging
* It is misuse of market power. The E-tag is not fit for purpose.
* Photographic methods are enforcement tools being used
inappropriately.
* Use of photographic enforcement tools means we don't pay a toll, but
buy an indemnity against prosecution.
* This is back to front as NO MEANS OF PAYING is provided
Any protest will be a display of strength of numbers, NOT to inconvenience
other drivers, particularly emergency or commercial traffic.
What can a protest achieve?
Publicity and public outcry to publicise the issues.
About what?
The toll rate needs fixing to a fair and reasonable level.
Despite all other problems with accounts and tolls, this issue is PRIME.
It stems from failure of public policy to include motorcycles in transport
planning
The failure to provide a suitable tolling method follows on from this.
Secondary are the issues about goods not fit for purpose, no suitable
electronic tolling method for motorcycles, additional fees for inability to
comply - so why the hell should we have to pay for this failure? There is a
good base of commercial law for those issues, but toll rate remains first
issue.
CIRCULATE this WIDELY
Cashless tolling on the Cross City Tunnel may result in a protest ride when
it opens.
A "Show of Strength" to induce good Television coverage of tolling issues.
To be discussed at next MCC meeting, June 6
Meeting with Minister for Roads this week.
Await outcomes before going crazy, but the outcomes may make us go crazy.
Please digest the following points and communicate them to your members.
Stay Tuned - more in one week.
Failure in transport planning has brought us to this.
* Motorcycles were not considered in traffic plans and have been
forgotten in government negotiations for privately run toll roads.
* This is why motorcycles have been tolled as cars since the 1986
agreement for the Harbour Tunnel pushed up ALL tolls. We just got lost in
the shouting about higher tolls.
* Now we can correct some of the failures to make provisions for
motorcycles.
* Some organisations will resist change, but the facts are very clear,
motorcyclists have been marginalised for years.
* NSW Government holds the contracts for toll roads - it is a policy
issue and hence a voters issue.
Toll rates for motorcycles are too high.
* A family sedan is no more a heavy truck than a motorcycle is a
family sedan.
* Differential toll rates exist between cars and trucks, but not
between cars and motorcycles in NSW.
* One-Quarter of the car rate is the fair and reasonable toll rate for
motorcycles.
* This rational figure is based upon road wear, space occupancy,
congestion and clean air considerations.
* Prescribed toll schedules fail to list motorcycles.
* Motorcycles are an afterthought.
Motorcyclists are happy to pay a toll.
* As long as the toll rate is reasonable AND that we are not charged
extra administrative fees.
E-tags don't work for most motorcycles
* The supplied E-tags are not fit for the purpose sold.
* Check out the 'Terms and Conditions' for the use of E-tags, no
mention of how to use them on motorcycles
* Advertising of E-tags to riders is misleading and fails to disclose
problems
* E-tag is not weatherproof, is affected by vibration and heat
* If it fails due to weather damage, it costs you
* Dangerous to carry upon ones person due to shattering to shards on
impact,
* Cannot be mounted to most motorcycles and hence can't be aimed
correctly at the antenna
* Fails to read due to inability to aim it correctly, hence further
administration costs charged to you
* Riders try to use them, but are forced into unsafe practices, such
as:-
* riding one-handed through the toll plaza, waving the tag until it
changes the taffic light colour
* placing it in a jacket pocket (the casing shatters into shards on
impact and can easily penetrate the body)-
* Using an armband pouch - this places the rider at risk due to
windage rotating the pouch and having it interfere with arm movement and
hence control of the motorcycle - worst on sportsbikes. Too tight causes
numbness. It also defeats the purpose of protective gear, providing a point
impact on the upper arm. These are dangerous
* The MCC of NSW has worked with the RTA and E-tag suppliers and
industrial designers to assist solving the problem
* No suitable E-tag exists anywhere in the world.
Alternative proposals for cashless tolling demand additional fees for not
using an E-tag
* Toll road operators are demanding riders pay for failure to use an
unsuitable E-tag
* The toll road operator expects riders to pay $1.60 per trip for
administration, in addition to the toll
* This is gouging
* It is misuse of market power. The E-tag is not fit for purpose.
* Photographic methods are enforcement tools being used
inappropriately.
* Use of photographic enforcement tools means we don't pay a toll, but
buy an indemnity against prosecution.
* This is back to front as NO MEANS OF PAYING is provided
Any protest will be a display of strength of numbers, NOT to inconvenience
other drivers, particularly emergency or commercial traffic.
What can a protest achieve?
Publicity and public outcry to publicise the issues.
About what?
The toll rate needs fixing to a fair and reasonable level.
Despite all other problems with accounts and tolls, this issue is PRIME.
It stems from failure of public policy to include motorcycles in transport
planning
The failure to provide a suitable tolling method follows on from this.
Secondary are the issues about goods not fit for purpose, no suitable
electronic tolling method for motorcycles, additional fees for inability to
comply - so why the hell should we have to pay for this failure? There is a
good base of commercial law for those issues, but toll rate remains first
issue.