Page 1 of 3

Sig Pics - Sizing - please read

Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:08 pm
by MadKaw
Please check your sig pic size...

From the Forum Guidelines..

Sig pics
Also, if would like a sig pic under your post please keep the size to about 500 w x 80 h pixels and as small a bytes as possible - under 30,000 would be good. We don't want the sigs bigger than the posts.!
If you want KSRC to host it, please send your sig pic to Dan for uploading.

Members who do not comply with the above may have ther sig removed.!

Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:12 pm
by robracer
Sig natzi :lol: :lol:

Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:26 pm
by Glen
Sorry :oops:

I'll fix it right away.

Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:41 pm
by Stace
Bloody hell Dave, Mine better be ok, after all it was your doing remember. ;-)

Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:43 pm
by hoffy
Is Mine OK

Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:47 pm
by robracer
hoffy wrote:Is Mine OK
Square Hoffy!.... thats cool, right click to get the properties & all will be revealed mate

Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:53 pm
by Glen
hoffy wrote:Is Mine OK
Yeah but theres some big black and gold thing blocking the scenery :roll:

Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:16 pm
by MadKaw
Glen wrote:
hoffy wrote:Is Mine OK
Yeah but theres some big black and gold thing blocking the scenery :roll:
The scenery looks to be moving faster though.....

and Stace, yours is OK, it had to be a little bigger to fit all that detail in... :shock:

Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:18 pm
by Stace
MadKaw wrote: Stace, yours is OK, it had to be a little bigger to fit all that detail in... :shock:
I deserved that i guess :oops:

Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:20 pm
by Duane
Dear Admin,

I currently have in my possession a picture of Stace eating poo he found on the ground at Phillip Island.

Can a exemption be made so I can have this image at 800x600 pixels as my signature?

My concern is that if you reduce the size any further than 800x600 you lose the detail that stace is indeed eating poo.


Honestly concerned,

Duane

Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:28 pm
by Stace
IT WAS RUBBER!!!!

Anyway, We're off topic

Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:51 pm
by MickLC
Stace wrote:IT WAS RUBBER!!!!....
We call them condoms here, and why were you eating one full of poo?

Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:01 pm
by photomike666
Stace wrote:Bloody hell Dave, Mine better be ok, after all it was your doing remember. ;-)
Oops, apparently, yours is too fat :oops:

Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:03 pm
by Stace
Can we stay on topic here??? Show some respect to Dave you guys. Bloody hell, Anyway, back to you Dave

Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:38 pm
by red_dave
Stace wrote:Can we stay on topic here??? Show some respect to Dave you guys. Bloody hell, Anyway, back to you Dave
Thanks Mate... I appreciate it... :D

http://www.ksrc-au.com/duane/ic/images/gfx_178.jpg

You did mean me didn't you? :?