Spot the difference
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 8:57 pm
Kawasaki Sportsbike Riders Club - Australia - Online Forum
Australian Kawasaki Sportsbike Riders Discussion Forum - All Welcome, free and easy to join, just click "register" below - www.ksrc-au.com
https://www.ksrc-au.com/phpBB3/
Spot the difference
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 9:01 pm
there both red ??? what else isnt similar ???
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 9:34 pm
It may be easier to pick the similarities.......they both have round wheels!!!! 
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 9:45 pm
i dont know about differences but i can spot the similarities, they both look boring as bat s@#t,
so bland and uninspired, just like every other plastic fantastic on the market (although the duc is carbonfibre fantastic)
gimme a big naked retro muscle bike anyday, something with a bit of style and class
so bland and uninspired, just like every other plastic fantastic on the market (although the duc is carbonfibre fantastic)
gimme a big naked retro muscle bike anyday, something with a bit of style and class
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:22 pm
java,
i want whatever drugs ur on.
i want whatever drugs ur on.
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:24 pm
You mean like this:sluglie wrote:i dont know about differences but i can spot the similarities, they both look boring as bat s@#t,
so bland and uninspired, just like every other plastic fantastic on the market (although the duc is carbonfibre fantastic)
gimme a big naked retro muscle bike anyday, something with a bit of style and class
Instead of this : ?
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 11:22 pm
no, more like this
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 12:03 am
Me toodiesel wrote:java,
i want whatever drugs ur on.
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:09 am
this difference is about $40,000.
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 6:34 am
It would be ALOT more than $40 000.
I thought I saw a US price of $60k or $70k for the Ducati.....
I thought I saw a US price of $60k or $70k for the Ducati.....
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 9:14 am
The main attraction of the "retro" bikes is their price and this is understandable in today's economy. The marketing has been excellent with these bikes too, and the purchasers rarely twig to the fact that they are buying outdated frame designs, shock absorbers and a host of other outdated "retro" embellishments that modern sports bikes have left far far behind.sluglie wrote:
gimme a big naked retro muscle bike anyday, something with a bit of style and class
I'll take a full fairing, an alloy frame and a mono-shock anyday.
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 9:53 am
Faaaarrrrkkkk Sluglie... what mongrel stuck that car muffler on the back of your bike mate? Track him down and bash the barstard and get him to give you bike can back mate !!!
I guess some lead trends and some follow, you just ignore me mate
I guess some lead trends and some follow, you just ignore me mate
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 11:47 am
you mean something that falls apart at the first signs of any sort of impact and becomes a stat wrieoff because the plastics cost sooooo much to replace,chameleon wrote:I'll take a full fairing, an alloy frame and a mono-shock anyday.
had lots of plastic wrapped crotch rockets and always more trouble than thay are worth, and cost twice as much to insure for a hell of a lot less bike
just remember 'modern' does not always mean 'better'
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 12:21 pm
same same but different!Javaman wrote:Spot the difference
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 12:42 pm
let's not forget sluglie, that u ride one of the best bikes on the market.
where would you be if there weren't any sports bikes without fairings? (lets face it, that's what the zrx's are)
would you really choose a cruiser? or a boring commuter? nuh. u got the best of both worlds IMO. personally i like one world better, even with the disadvantages.
where would you be if there weren't any sports bikes without fairings? (lets face it, that's what the zrx's are)
would you really choose a cruiser? or a boring commuter? nuh. u got the best of both worlds IMO. personally i like one world better, even with the disadvantages.