Re: Unmarked cop bikes
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2011 7:56 am
You dont have as big a target on your back as I do Seiko....one day young padawan 

Australian Kawasaki Sportsbike Riders Discussion Forum - All Welcome, free and easy to join, just click "register" below - www.ksrc-au.com
https://www.ksrc-au.com/phpBB3/
Obviously not if you are white. Sorry I have to go. Time to plant another burning cross in my neighbours front yard.QWAKA wrote:I'm guessing this is a stab at my earlier post? not much i have to say to a racist who struggles with the english language himself!!!!! So you obviously don't consider it DANGEROUS for someone to wipe out a whole family in a head on crash due to the fact that they were speeding.....MAXUMIS wrote:the cops have the best job high way patrol they can legally do what they want and have what ever they want( on there own bikes LOL!) because if they get pulled over they are treated like a brother. they get PAID from the shit we have to throw away(tax)but yet your average cop is a fake ive rang them in a time of need and they never showed up.they like doing shit thats ezy.i guese there to busy fucking each other but to be honest all the video shit they have now the old days have long gone.a good kick up the arse was the days i lived with not liking it but they would let you be and just a warning.they should be chasing the DANGEROUS shit that can't even talk english!!!!!:kuda:
Thanks for the Airhawk by the way!hoffy V2.0 wrote:You dont have as big a target on your back as I do Seiko....one day young padawan
The streak marks came off then eh Hoffseiko1 wrote:Thanks for the Airhawk by the way!hoffy V2.0 wrote:You dont have as big a target on your back as I do Seiko....one day young padawan
Looks Brand Spankin New![]()
I like the message on the card too
Could name alot more than that in all 3 emergency services. Like everyone else you do your best with the equipment you've got.Deanoseadog wrote:Did you know that police bullet proof vests are supposed to get replaced every 5 yrs. They haven't been replaced in 15yrs.
Glad there spending money on unmarked HP bikes though eh.
Nope, sorry, but I have to disagree. The road rules are written to take into account the most incompetent drivers since our driving tests do not include anything that requires you to be able to control a vehicle at speed. Far too many people can't stay in their lanes, have no idea how to corner at speeds over 60kph and are completely clueless about slippery conditions because they never really learnt how to drive, just how to pass a basic slow speed test. So illegal driving does not necessarily equal stupid or dangerous driving because the laws are set for the incompetent and competent drivers can go beyond these limits safely and often do so without any harm to themselves or others.QWAKA wrote:stupid driving = illegal driving, illegal driving =stupid driving. both = dangerous driving no matter how you look at it
Its lots of fun in a 16 tonne pumperNelso wrote:have no idea how to corner at speeds over 60kph and are completely clueless about slippery conditions because they never really learnt how to drive
It is legal for them to break the speed limit (and other road rules) when necessary and they declare that it is safe to do so because of their training. If ALL speeding was dangerous no police would be allowed to break the speed limit for ANY reason!
Bingo!!!Nelso wrote:Nope, sorry, but I have to disagree. The road rules are written to take into account the most incompetent drivers since our driving tests do not include anything that requires you to be able to control a vehicle at speed. Far too many people can't stay in their lanes, have no idea how to corner at speeds over 60kph and are completely clueless about slippery conditions because they never really learnt how to drive, just how to pass a basic slow speed test. So illegal driving does not necessarily equal stupid or dangerous driving because the laws are set for the incompetent and competent drivers can go beyond these limits safely and often do so without any harm to themselves or others.QWAKA wrote:stupid driving = illegal driving, illegal driving =stupid driving. both = dangerous driving no matter how you look at it
You will find that the majority of road accidents are driver error because of a lack of skill or from not paying attention whilst driving. All speed does is change the severity of the impact, not cause the incident. The police (especially highway patrol) are proof that it is possible to speed safely. It is legal for them to break the speed limit (and other road rules) when necessary and they declare that it is safe to do so because of their training. If ALL speeding was dangerous no police would be allowed to break the speed limit for ANY reason!
i think you'll find that police have accidents as well, that also result in deaths. and yes speed does change the severity of the impact, which is exactly the reason they enforce speed limitsNelso wrote:Nope, sorry, but I have to disagree. The road rules are written to take into account the most incompetent drivers since our driving tests do not include anything that requires you to be able to control a vehicle at speed. Far too many people can't stay in their lanes, have no idea how to corner at speeds over 60kph and are completely clueless about slippery conditions because they never really learnt how to drive, just how to pass a basic slow speed test. So illegal driving does not necessarily equal stupid or dangerous driving because the laws are set for the incompetent and competent drivers can go beyond these limits safely and often do so without any harm to themselves or others.QWAKA wrote:stupid driving = illegal driving, illegal driving =stupid driving. both = dangerous driving no matter how you look at it
You will find that the majority of road accidents are driver error because of a lack of skill or from not paying attention whilst driving. All speed does is change the severity of the impact, not cause the incident. The police (especially highway patrol) are proof that it is possible to speed safely. It is legal for them to break the speed limit (and other road rules) when necessary and they declare that it is safe to do so because of their training. If ALL speeding was dangerous no police would be allowed to break the speed limit for ANY reason!
Ilike that! Therefore, if you can navigate your local racetrack below a certain time limit, or have completed multiple levels of rider training etc you should be allowed a 20km/hr buffer above the speed limit because of your skills as a rider.Nelso wrote:The police (especially highway patrol) are proof that it is possible to speed safely. It is legal for them to break the speed limit (and other road rules) when necessary and they declare that it is safe to do so because of their training. If ALL speeding was dangerous no police would be allowed to break the speed limit for ANY reason!
So did I while u weren't lookinghoffy V2.0 wrote:I farted on that airhawk, it was juicy too, just a heads up..
Thats not true....I'm possesed by the spirit of a ghost that was used to having fun thirty yr's ago!QWAKA wrote:the only person in control of your wrist or foot is you!![]()