Page 4 of 4
Posted: Sat May 27, 2006 6:09 pm
by hammer
aardvark wrote:
smaller than the ZX12
Counts me out, think they would make a bike for normal size ppl.
Posted: Sat May 27, 2006 6:13 pm
by Smitty
aardvark wrote:
I flat foot on both sides without any problems. It also feels lighter and smaller than the ZX12 if you do a back to back comparison.
I did a back to back today......
12 v 14 (nice red one too)
feels exactly the same
I can flat foot both and seat is really not too high
the only difference I spotted is that the 14 has more weight over the
front tyre
also there is NO way one can adjust the rear suspension...easily
looks like part of the rear frame has to come out to
get a C spanner up to the rear shock
cheers
Posted: Sat May 27, 2006 6:21 pm
by Smitty
and I can report ..the 14 seems to be selling well
Brighton Kwaka got 3 on Tuesday
on the floor on Thursday...sold 2 on Friday
1 red one left atm
and the next 2 are already sold
with an RRP of $19099 plus onroads...no wonder
Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 5:11 am
by half_empty1
the looks are growing on me, especially in the blue colour,
i might even be swayed into getting 1 instead of a zx10r,
i gonna have to come for a test ride when i arrive in brissy in oct/nov
i just hope you have some left for sale

Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 11:11 pm
by ShadowKeeper
Smitty wrote:with an RRP of $19099 plus onroads...no wonder
I paid less than that including on roads
Shadow Keeper
2006 ZX-14
2000 ZZR1100
Posted: Mon May 29, 2006 2:14 pm
by z900/zx9
If they threw in a boggie licence i would certainly upgrade

have enough trouble not gettin booked on the 9
