princess plates

Blue14 · Post by **Blue14** » Sat Feb 11, 2006 2:37 pm

Well done to you...

now just remember ZX12R ...

red_dave · Post by **red_dave** » Mon Feb 13, 2006 11:02 am

Onya Kellz...

JamesLaugesen · Post by **JamesLaugesen** » Mon Feb 13, 2006 11:28 am

Hi, you must've joined while I was away sulking :lol:

.
So hi and welcome and congradulations.
I still haven't ridden the new 'gong bridge from stanwell tops, damn it looks cool though.

Duane · Post by **Duane** » Mon Feb 13, 2006 11:54 am

Good work.

T · Post by T » Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:33 pm

Well done Girlie,

See i told you, you would get it!!

Still take it easy though.............. :wink:

mobile · Post by **mobile** » Mon Feb 13, 2006 1:26 pm

Congrats and way to go, hold out and have fun

kellz · Post by **kellz** » Mon Feb 13, 2006 2:48 pm

JamesLaugesen wrote:Hi, you must've joined while I was away sulking .
So hi and welcome and congradulations.
I still haven't ridden the new 'gong bridge from stanwell tops, damn it looks cool though.

its fun, hang on il re phgrase that, its fun at early hours of teh morning when noone is on it otherwise form say 8-8 its full of tourist locals going ohh ahhh and doin 20 km

mick_dundee · Post by **mick_dundee** » Mon Feb 13, 2006 3:10 pm

Kelly and NSW riders et al, i'm still puzzled why you guys ride a 250 when LAMS are available, this also applies to SA now as they recently had LAMS approval.

kellz · Post by **kellz** » Mon Feb 13, 2006 4:40 pm

i ride my 250 because it was given to me, hence it was free...

its getting very tempting to upgrade to another lams bike but think, nah its only 12 montsh and i ahev my brothers to play with on teh track

JamesLaugesen · Post by **JamesLaugesen** » Mon Feb 13, 2006 6:33 pm

mick_dundee wrote:Kelly and NSW riders et al, i'm still puzzled why you guys ride a 250 when LAMS are available, this also applies to SA now as they recently had LAMS approval.

LAMS is power to weight; generally you're gunna get the same ride regardless. More torque maybe, and some bigger bikes so more comfort for big folk. So really in means a wider selection of bikes, but not a new superior selection.
Some bikes with approved restriction could be cost effective so you don't need another bike later (or being sneaky and removing the restriction). But I recon most people prefer having a learning bike, and then another 'big' bike.

I know a few big guys who've gone for bigger LAMS approved bikes like GS500, but only for the safety factor.

Anyway what's wrong with 250's? They're plenty of bike for a couple of years. Maybe a bit lacking if you're into long distance or adventure touring, but for the average 250 sport-biker dreaming about 120hp beats, there's plenty of learning in a 250 to keep you occupied for the most-part of the princess plates

Thanks for the heads-up about the bridge. I love riding in early morning so I'll have to shoot down there one day for a dawn-ride when this new zx9 engine is crankin'

kellz · Post by **kellz** » Mon Feb 13, 2006 6:55 pm

heeh yeh i know
i loev my 250 corners well, has teh ability to allow me to get my knee close to being down, no leathers or sloders so knee to gravel aint good at the moment, and hey it doenst go to abd on long trips will be testing taht out soon im riding to port mac in march

if u head down let us know i will prob tag along if u want some company

Neka79 · Post by **Neka79** » Mon Feb 13, 2006 7:18 pm

JamesLaugesen wrote:
mick_dundee wrote:Kelly and NSW riders et al, i'm still puzzled why you guys ride a 250 when LAMS are available, this also applies to SA now as they recently had LAMS approval.

LAMS is power to weight; generally you're gunna get the same ride regardless. More torque maybe, and some bigger bikes so more comfort for big folk. So really in means a wider selection of bikes, but not a new superior selection.
Some bikes with approved restriction could be cost effective so you don't need another bike later (or being sneaky and removing the restriction). But I recon most people prefer having a learning bike, and then another 'big' bike.

I know a few big guys who've gone for bigger LAMS approved bikes like GS500, but only for the safety factor.

Anyway what's wrong with 250's? They're plenty of bike for a couple of years. Maybe a bit lacking if you're into long distance or adventure touring, but for the average 250 sport-biker dreaming about 120hp beats, there's plenty of learning in a 250 to keep you occupied for the most-part of the princess plates

Thanks for the heads-up about the bridge. I love riding in early morning so I'll have to shoot down there one day for a dawn-ride when this new zx9 engine is crankin'

not to mention costs...250's are cheaper to reg & insure...and running costs arent that bad..and when u consider most L/P platers are younger..with less $$ to throw at bikes....

good work kelz, least u got 360 odd days to save for ur new cbr 600rr...hahahah

kellz · Post by **kellz** » Mon Feb 13, 2006 7:24 pm

no cbr's for me sorry i want a bike that will be reliable, lol

so i got a 95 zx6r waiting for me in the garage....

got to love having an older brother who rides and lieks to upgrade regularly

JamesLaugesen · Post by **JamesLaugesen** » Mon Feb 13, 2006 7:25 pm

Oh thanks Neka, I knew I forgot something when I clicked "post".
Yeah CTP can end up ridiculously more expensive for a bigger LAMS bike.