Page 3 of 3
Re: Cameras
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 7:49 pm
by robracer
I never take my cards out for the very reason, but..... driving off to take some Pics from the hill requires one to actually take the camera & not leave it in the pit garage, only to drive back & be handed said camera by Cath laughing her face off
So have we had any progress Jenny?
Re: Cameras
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 7:49 pm
by Jennysc
Thanks everyone, she ended up getting the Nikon 3000 with an 18-55 lens. She's happy with it and it is good enough to start with.
Jen
Re: Cameras
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 7:56 pm
by robracer
Excellent, now you have easy birthday/Christmas presents with lenses & accessories

Re: Cameras
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:53 am
by mike-s
Re: Cameras
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 11:02 am
by tim
mike-s wrote:
Forgot the effing flashcard too.
GHAhahahahahahahahha
ahahahah
ahahahhaahhhhhhahhahahhahahah
ahah
ha

Re: Cameras
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 11:46 am
by photomike666
photomike666 wrote:the kid wrote:the large aperture (lower F number) will allow a very short depth of field, or will allow faster shutter speeds in low light, but both of these are extreme exceptions
Not sure that I agree entirely with this Mike . Taking shots of bikes racing would not be considered an extreme exception , especially around here . That is where a fast lens is going to make a world of difference .
Why?
You're outside so light is generally good, so you can run a fast shutter speed without needing an aperture of F2, F4 would be perfectly OK. Also, with such a wide aperture your depth of field is so narrow it becomes hard to get really sharp focus. Remember the further away you are the longer lens you use and the narrower the depth of field. F4 at 200mm will give a depth of field of less than 30cm. If the riders shoulder is in focus, his face is out of focus. For bikes you rarely need a shutter speed much faster than 1/500sec, esp in the corners, so you can put the aperture at around F5.6-F8. On the straights it's better to use a slower shutter speed with a smaller aperture and pan with the bike to blur the background...
Here's two I prepared earlier - like 2005 MotoGP...
Re: Cameras
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:44 pm
by mike-s
tim, i promise you that i DID see the irony of it all at the time. It was kind of diluted by the fact i was pissed off somewhat.
Re: Cameras
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 12:19 am
by tim
mike-s wrote:tim, i promise you that i DID see the irony of it all at the time. It was kind of diluted by the fact i was pissed off somewhat.
I can imagine!
