Page 2 of 2

Re: Census question 54

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 10:11 am
by Jonno
Motorcycles is a small omission in the grand scheme of things but a relatively easy option to include on the form.

Its a true and accurate snap shot of society apparently, so was the others I have completed in the past and they did not use that gathered information at all that I can tell :roll: Just another way to learn how to tax us more and keep an eye on us all in my paranoid opinion. I cannot see how this will help me at all and a complete waste of my time.I resent it being mandatory just like I resent it being mandatory to vote, waiting for the census police to come knocking on my door so i can reluctantly fill the form in. :finga:

Cheers

The rebellious Donkey voter :lol:








Dont take this seriously

Re: Census question 54

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 10:16 am
by seiko1
Even if you fill out a Vote card correctly, you're still voting for a Donkey!
So it's a Donkey vote either way! ;)

Re: Census question 54

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 11:04 am
by laidback
seiko1 wrote:Even if you fill out a Vote card correctly, you're still voting for a Donkey!
So it's a Donkey vote either way! ;)
+1

I believe that a census gathers data about us that is available for all types of users.

The problem is that I don't have any faith in the donkeys turning this data into information. :?

Re: Census question 54

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 5:18 pm
by seiko1
laidback wrote:
seiko1 wrote:Even if you fill out a Vote card correctly, you're still voting for a Donkey!
So it's a Donkey vote either way! ;)
+1

I believe that a census gathers data about us that is available for all types of users.

The problem is that I don't have any faith in the donkeys turning this data into information. :?
100% will be cross referenced with C/Link and ATO records ;)

Re: Census question 54

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 6:26 pm
by laidback
seiko1 wrote:100% will be cross referenced with C/Link and ATO records ;)
Ye of little faith...they promise that name are not included :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Census question 54

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 9:55 pm
by JonW
How can you guage the non response to a question not asked in the first place as a reason to not ask it again?

Julailogic

Re: Census question 54

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 5:27 pm
by Jonno
JonW wrote:How can you guage the non response to a question not asked in the first place as a reason to not ask it again?

Julailogic
That does my head in anyway I turn it :?

Re: Census question 54

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 7:33 pm
by seiko1
JonW wrote:How can you guage the non response to a question not asked in the first place as a reason to not ask it again?

Julailogic
The same way you can go back in time and kill your grandfather so that you cease to exist and
if you don't exist how can you have gone back in time and killed your granfather! :lol:
The answer is simple really, the new timeline you create, no longer has you in it but the old one still does....
but you would not be allowed to do any of this in the first place because we MUST HAVE ORDER....even
temporal order!!!!! :lol: