Page 2 of 4
Re: A tale of two cities:)
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:23 am
by Benno
Melbourne > Sydney. By a loooooooooonnnnnggggggg way
Sydney is a nice place to visit, but definitely wouldn't want to live there again.
Re: A tale of two cities:)
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:16 pm
by Colette
Thanks everyone - on both counts - it's much appreciated

Re: A tale of two cities:)
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:24 pm
by Big Al Glynn
Colette wrote:Thanks everyone - on both counts - it's much appreciated

Take it easy Colette, there are bad apples wherever you go, will you be ok ???????
Re: A tale of two cities:)
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 9:18 pm
by smek
Naked Twin wrote:Sydney has to be the choice it simply has the most variety, Sydney is truly a metropolis we have a choice of everything - beaches, fine dining, culture, country, wineries withing two hours, the blue mountains, a harbour that you need to take trip around, traffic (but that is only if you live in the wrong area to where you work)
the reason Sydney doesn't turn up in big numbers to sporting events like in Melbourne is because we have something to do.
Yes it is more expensive but you pay for what you get.
Nick
geez you obviously haven't spent much time in Melbourne. Way more culture and better dining than Sydney. Much better bars too, thanks to the cheaper liquor licences. I'll probably give Sydney the better beaches (although I haven't had a proper summer here yet) because the ocean beaches have some seriously cold water, even in the heights of summer. Still loved going down to Half Moon Bay after work in Summer though..
Re: A tale of two cities:)
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:11 pm
by seraph
Hope you're ok Colette... humans can be such scum sometimes
My vote's for Sydney, just because I love her well
J.
Re: A tale of two cities:)
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:57 pm
by Smitty
Naked Twin wrote:Sydney has to be the choice it simply has the most variety, Sydney is truly a metropolis we have a choice of everything - beaches, fine dining, culture, country, wineries withing two hours, the blue mountains, a harbour that you need to take trip around, traffic (but that is only if you live in the wrong area to where you work)
the reason Sydney doesn't turn up in big numbers to sporting events like in Melbourne is because we have something to do.
Yes it is more expensive but you pay for what you get.
Nick
hehe
haha...here we go the ol' Synney vs Melb deal
Melbourne has wineries within 20 mins from the CBD (or the world renown Yarra Valley an hour away)
Melbourne has beaches...for swimming with the family in safety or surfing for those who do... Bells is home to Aussie surfing
and Torquay is surf capital of Oz
Melbourne definitely has the better dining ..and its cheaper (Gawd. is it cheap compared to Sydney..Doyles at the Rocks floored me price wise last week)
Melbourne is the art and fashion capital of Oz ..
Melbourne has the Dandenong ranges with 3/4hr from the CBD
Melbourne has better trams than Sydney (and no restaurant trams in Sydney)
Sydney has a harbour..nice one too, bugger to get around on
Melbourne has the Gt Ocean Road..its a bugger now too with speed zones and too many caravans
Melbourne has the Island..yep Phillip Is and Sandown and Calder and Winton raceways
Sydney is older..has to be...has Mrs Macs chair too!
BOTH have VAST areas of new housing a squillion kms from anywhere...with no trees and little pub transport
traffic?...well not going there
so there ya go!
cheers
Smitty
Re: A tale of two cities:)
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 6:53 am
by aardvark
There was a professor from Sydney (could have been Melbourne, don't really remember) who the South Aus state government brought to Adelaide to try and revitalise the city. In an interview he said "The people of Adelaide have been spoilt by not having to wait an hour in queues."
Fuck, that's WHY I live in Adelaide! If he thinks making queues longer (for just about anything going from my trips around the country) is going to revitalise things, he can just piss off back to the land of over priced housing and food, where traffic is horrendous and people alledgedly spend hours waiting in queues!!
Re: A tale of two cities:)
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 7:04 am
by robracer
aardvark wrote: that's WHY I live in Adelaide! !!
Does not count jase.... this is a tale of two cities........... not a tale of two cities & a backwater

Re: A tale of two cities:)
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 7:48 am
by Naked Twin
Smitty wrote:Naked Twin wrote:Sydney has to be the choice it simply has the most variety, Sydney is truly a metropolis we have a choice of everything - beaches, fine dining, culture, country, wineries withing two hours, the blue mountains, a harbour that you need to take trip around, traffic (but that is only if you live in the wrong area to where you work)
the reason Sydney doesn't turn up in big numbers to sporting events like in Melbourne is because we have something to do.
Yes it is more expensive but you pay for what you get.
Nick
hehe
haha...here we go the ol' Synney vs Melb deal
Melbourne has wineries within 20 mins from the CBD (or the world renown Yarra Valley an hour away)
Melbourne has beaches...for swimming with the family in safety or surfing for those who do... Bells is home to Aussie surfing
and Torquay is surf capital of Oz
Melbourne definitely has the better dining ..and its cheaper (Gawd. is it cheap compared to Sydney..Doyles at the Rocks floored me price wise last week)
Melbourne is the art and fashion capital of Oz ..
Melbourne has the Dandenong ranges with 3/4hr from the CBD
Melbourne has better trams than Sydney (and no restaurant trams in Sydney)
Sydney has a harbour..nice one too, bugger to get around on
Melbourne has the Gt Ocean Road..its a bugger now too with speed zones and too many caravans
Melbourne has the Island..yep Phillip Is and Sandown and Calder and Winton raceways
Sydney is older..has to be...has Mrs Macs chair too!
BOTH have VAST areas of new housing a squillion kms from anywhere...with no trees and little pub transport
traffic?...well not going there
so there ya go!
cheers
Smitty
you left of one thing, hook turns and you can keep them
world renown Yarra, is that the turd coloured river that someone swam in once
You can have the art and fashion capital, you will look real pretty in a nice frock carrying your mozart
look the easiest way to tell which is best is look at the number plates and what is said. The last time I saw a VIC number plate it read "Vic on the move" which I believe is on the move outta there

NSW simply says premier state, which translates to number 1!
Nothing better then messing with mexicans
To be fair I could live in Melbourne, I do like the city as it is relatively flat but Sydney is where they will bury me.
Nick
Re: A tale of two cities:)
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 8:18 am
by Che
Tale of two cities huh....

Tis a far far better thing I do now than I have ever done before, tis a far far sweeter rest I go to than I have ever known...

Knit away madam Defarge...what drugs?

Re: A tale of two cities:)
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 8:42 am
by smek
aardvark wrote:Fuck, that's WHY I live in Adelaide!
That's why I ride a bike =)
Re: A tale of two cities:)
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:04 am
by red_dave
I love Melbourne...
Perfect wee wee stop on the way to PI

Re: A tale of two cities:)
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:51 am
by Smitty
Naked Twin wrote:[you left of one thing, hook turns and you can keep them
better than a fight with a 20 tonne tram

Re: A tale of two cities:)
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 11:25 am
by fireyrob
Re: A tale of two cities:)
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 11:57 am
by robracer

thats a classic, I have been playing the kiddy version for so long with miss 6 & miss 4.5 I had forgotten about the real monopoly
