Page 2 of 3
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 9:15 am
by Colette
Cath I only just saw this thread, am so glad you are OK mate - it could happen to any one of us, but thank goodness you are still intact and insured!
Please don't hesitate to contact me if you need anything at all, heal quickly xx
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 9:33 am
by Daisy
Smitty wrote:did you suggest that next time....
he pulls that stunt in front of a 40 wheel semi
What he said.
Glad you are ok.
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 9:43 am
by MickLC
Ahhhh bugger Cath, not good news, but at least you didn't come out of it too badly knocked around...although that's no excuse for Dave slacking off and not pampering you as you deserve after your ordeal

Re: I'm calling my first child "crash"
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 10:40 am
by Cath
aardvark wrote:Cath wrote:am stiff
So, what do you think? Is it all it's cracked up to be?
No, it's not. Quite disappointing actually. It was much better in my dreams
Now to answer questions:
It's highly arguable that he was at fault, since he didn't check before moving out and didn't indicate, but the circumstances are a bit murky. The 'lane' I was in is not actually a marked lane, but a road that is wide enough for two cars and is used as two lanes as there is usually a queue of right-turners. If it was a marked lane, it would be clearly his fault, since it isn't - not so clear. And there was one gung-ho witness who made it very clear that they thought I was at fault and was loudly offering themself up if the driver needed a witness, giving me dirty looks. There was no damage to his car - the car only hit me, not the bike, so no problems there.
The damage is minimal enough that I think it's better to pay out of my own pocket, rather than a long drawn-out, disputed process that isn't very likely to end in success and that will hurt my insurance premiums anyway.
TurBIce - it happened on Tuesday morning, on my way to work. I sat on the side of the road for 10 minutes afterwards, then continued riding to work. The damage is very minor and cosmetic only.
Thanks for all the well wishes. In some small way, it's kind of a relief. The longer I've been riding, and the more confident and faster I get, there's been a little voice in the back of my head saying "You've gotta have your first off at some point... it's going to be a big one at this rate". Now I've got it out of the way and can get on with it. I've always been a little superstitious about the 'never had an off' thing (on horses and bikes), so am pleased it's all over and was a small one.
Mick: Believe me - after all the shit I've heaped on Dave, his refraining from doing the "I told you so" dance is equivalent to major pampering!

Re: I'm calling my first child "crash"
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 11:07 am
by MickLC
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 12:40 pm
by hoffy
bummer Cath, I hope your bike fixes soon..
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 12:54 pm
by mohawk miss
Obviously the witless, sorry, witness, is a fine upstanding member of the All -motorcycle- riders- are- scum- who- deserve- to- be- run- over League.
Sorry to hear about your off, Cath, on the plus side you broke no bones and its saveable. Hope its all good soon.

Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 1:17 pm
by photomike666
Sorry to hear Cath, heal up soon. I can post you a tin of t-cut if you need it? As long as that fine exhaust is Ok!!!!
Re: I'm calling my first child "crash"
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 1:20 pm
by Glen
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 3:39 pm
by Wattie
dam cath...
now i think its time to hit the track with it
you know you want to

Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 3:59 pm
by Phil
bummer cath, glad your ok, and the bike is easily fixable.
bet dave has got a major increase in his available brownie points - as soon as you well enough for him to cash them in that is

Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 4:01 pm
by mike-s
well firstly glad your doing ok & minimal harm to you & the bike. Secondly i am guessing you were in a reasonably quiet area, or were turning out of a small road as your "lane" wasnt devided officially, i always thought ot was acceptable to go up the left to turn left if people on the right were turning right or going straight through (if they were turning left too, THEN it'd just be plain rude to do what you did).
Lastly that witness sounds like an absolute nugget, what shard of info could they give had it come to insurance that would change the way things panned out. i.e.
The 'victim' was in theright lane, demonic bike rider (i swear i saw a pitchfork in her tankbag!) came screaming up on the left hand side with the rear wheel in the air and RAN INTO the bike as it was already cutting left. I mean ffs yould have to do the maths on where you were and the bike and yadda yadda yadda smack-witness-in-the-face-with-a-handfull-of-nails yadda.
At least on the bright side, by ksrc standards it was a minor one

Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 4:08 pm
by MickLC
Sadly people think exactly this kind of thing. An 18 year old died recently in Canberra when a car pulled out in front his R1. Today's paper had a letter from someone with the usual "What was a p-plater doing riding that sort of bike, must've been speeding or riding dangerously, need more rider training etc etc", even though there have been no indications that he was a p-plater or was speeding, and of course he would've done the compulsory training that all riders have to do but no car drivers do...idiots

Re: I'm calling my first child "crash"
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 4:09 pm
by MickLC
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 4:11 pm
by mike-s
What about "Knobby"? or is that Dave #3?