Page 2 of 3

Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 3:45 pm
by aardvark
javaman wrote: Wow. How did they do that? Has image recognition come that far ?
I don't think so. As far as I can tell, people are being paid to spam forums, so it's real people joining up.

Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 3:47 pm
by jewjew
no Java,

It is real people joining rather than just bots...

Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 4:08 pm
by javaman
aardvark wrote:
javaman wrote: Wow. How did they do that? Has image recognition come that far ?
I don't think so. As far as I can tell, people are being paid to spam forums, so it's real people joining up.

farken hell I never thought of that :shock:

Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:08 pm
by jewjew
please read previous posts

Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 6:02 pm
by TopCat
Chuck wrote:I used to eat spam when I was a kid :lol:
So did I - Stuff Posing As Meat

Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 6:27 pm
by ozx6r
would email verifiction reduce it at all or is not worth the excercise?

Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 7:10 pm
by Smitty
red_dave wrote:
mfzx6r wrote:
red_dave wrote:Smitty wants something... :shock:


:wink:
maybe they need to get their own room ? :lol: :lol:
Yeah, but did they even have Porno music back in their day? :lol:
B&W porn in my youth :wink:

Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:01 pm
by mike-s
lemme guess, boobie shots only and any trace of tassie & friends airbrushed out. a far cry from the crap coming involuntarily in our inboxes nowdays

Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:31 pm
by Neka79
dont knock porn!!

Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:47 pm
by Smitty
mike-s wrote:lemme guess, boobie shots only and any trace of tassie & friends airbrushed out. a far cry from the crap coming involuntarily in our inboxes nowdays
oooh Mikes back...gidday mate

B&W porn in the late 60s and 70s
lots was shot in Synney :shock:

and much better than todays crap, like...
Maria and Zane
shot in Kings Cross was good







Zane was her dog :wink:


cheers
Smitty

Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 9:39 pm
by mike-s
oh yes, yes i am, thankyou for noticing.back on track though. From what i've seen collecting the older "classy" porn seems to be a bit of a habit for some people :).

Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 9:44 pm
by Gosling1
ozx6r wrote:would email verifiction reduce it at all or is not worth the excercise?
It would, and a lot of the overseas forums I have joined will only allow membership after a confirming e-mail is sent . Not sure on the logisitics of this, I think there is some automated e-mail stuff available to reduce the workload for admins ? Who BTW do a great job here on reducing the amount of crap we have to read .. :wink:

8)

Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:36 pm
by Neka79
Gosling1 wrote:Who BTW do a great job here on reducing the amount of crap we have to read .. :wink:

8)
u reckon?? they still let mina dribble his shit in here...

Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 8:54 am
by mfzx6r
Neka79 wrote:
Gosling1 wrote:Who BTW do a great job here on reducing the amount of crap we have to read .. :wink:

8)
u reckon?? they still let mina dribble his shit in here...
pot calling kettle hello !!! :lol: :lol:

Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 9:01 am
by MadKaw
Gosling1 wrote:
ozx6r wrote:would email verifiction reduce it at all or is not worth the excercise?
It would, and a lot of the overseas forums I have joined will only allow membership after a confirming e-mail is sent . Not sure on the logisitics of this, I think there is some automated e-mail stuff available to reduce the workload for admins ? Who BTW do a great job here on reducing the amount of crap we have to read .. :wink:

8)
We already do that..
You will notice we have very little (if any these days) spam actually posted to the forums..
Neka and Mina's posts excluded of course..