Re: Unmarked cop bikes
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2011 9:58 pm
QWAKA wrote: ............not lies, just facts and figures
So, would those be "damn lies" or "statistics" ????
Australian Kawasaki Sportsbike Riders Discussion Forum - All Welcome, free and easy to join, just click "register" below - www.ksrc-au.com
https://www.ksrc-au.com/phpBB3/
QWAKA wrote: ............not lies, just facts and figures
hoffy V2.0 wrote:And ban steak knives, those bastards are sharp and can hurt my twinky little fingers, and let face it they are practical *but* one day i just be a complete moron and stab my neighbour with it, so its best just to get rid of them all before this could happen..
Bwahahaha ........ nice one, Dave !!Disco wrote:Ok who's sock puppet is QWAKA?....![]()
Yes ban everything bro..QWAKA wrote:hoffy V2.0 wrote:And ban steak knives, those bastards are sharp and can hurt my twinky little fingers, and let face it they are practical *but* one day i just be a complete moron and stab my neighbour with it, so its best just to get rid of them all before this could happen..
dont see many steak knifes that weigh 200+ kg on the roads travelling at 200+ kph, but if you cant handle a knife with your twinky little fingers without hurting yourself then maybe we should ban them
now that was fark'n funny, nice callhoffy V2.0 wrote:Yes ban everything bro..QWAKA wrote:hoffy V2.0 wrote:And ban steak knives, those bastards are sharp and can hurt my twinky little fingers, and let face it they are practical *but* one day i just be a complete moron and stab my neighbour with it, so its best just to get rid of them all before this could happen..
dont see many steak knifes that weigh 200+ kg on the roads travelling at 200+ kph, but if you cant handle a knife with your twinky little fingers without hurting yourself then maybe we should ban them
Heres a thought, is it dangerous to fart while driving? I let off some rippers, and it can be a distraction !! You should have to slow to 30kph if ya wanna rip one off, or you could spear into a tarago and muder a family of 7.
Discuss...
Thankfully, my feeble mind can decipher certain aspects of terminology. So all the deaths you mention, have speed as a contributing factor. That means if I a m doing 40 in a 60 zone, and we collide and I die, then speed is a contributing factor. Now attempt to have your more feeble than my mind, explain how a police report on such an incident would be utilised to create the statistics you so proudly profur.QWAKA wrote:i'm not saying that 40% of accidents are caused by speeding, i'm saying that of all the DEATHS that occur on our roads, around 40% of the DEATHS have speed as a contributing factor.... the other 60% of DEATHS are made up of D.U.I, fatigue and driver error. cant really put it any simpler than that, if your feeble minds cant understand this then i guess we are up the proverbial creek without a paddle![]()
its hard to soar like an eagle when i'm surrounded by turkeys
hoffy V2.0 wrote:..... is it dangerous to fart while driving? I let off some rippers, and it can be a distraction !! ...
You cruel bastards !! Won't somebody think of the Sniffer dogs ??? Look what happened last time they had to sniff The Lord Hugemongous' undergarments !!!!Strika wrote:........I let one go in the MR2 the other day which melted the dashboard and poor little Oskar almost forced me into a Tarago driving family as he strained on his car restraint try to make it to the window.
So yeah, perhaps police should be using more sniffer dogs at crash investigations.......
not all just 40%!! if you are doing 40 in a 60 zone then obviously it wasn't speeding it would be driver error or fatigue or D.U.I but if you were doing 70 in a 60 zone then yes speed is a contributing factor because you were travelling above the posted limit. ps i dont watch that shite but thanks for the heads upStrika wrote:Thankfully, my feeble mind can decipher certain aspects of terminology. So all the deaths you mention, have speed as a contributing factor. That means if I a m doing 40 in a 60 zone, and we collide and I die, then speed is a contributing factor. Now attempt to have your more feeble than my mind, explain how a police report on such an incident would be utilised to create the statistics you so proudly profur.QWAKA wrote:i'm not saying that 40% of accidents are caused by speeding, i'm saying that of all the DEATHS that occur on our roads, around 40% of the DEATHS have speed as a contributing factor.... the other 60% of DEATHS are made up of D.U.I, fatigue and driver error. cant really put it any simpler than that, if your feeble minds cant understand this then i guess we are up the proverbial creek without a paddle![]()
its hard to soar like an eagle when i'm surrounded by turkeys
I believe there are some interesting stories on today tonight this week which potentially utilise similar types of statistics which may well suit your comprehension levels. I hope you enjoy them.
wouldn't that be almost 100 deaths? not a thousand.....Gosling1 wrote:An early contender for "Thread of The Year" 2011 !!
Keep up the good work people![]()
With almost 100 speeding/traffic convictions to my name, I can hardly add an objective post to this most magnificent thread, other than saying that if speed really did kill, well I must have already died a thousand deaths.....
As you were.....