Re: Ten riders...now NWS
Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2011 9:47 pm
seiko1 wrote:Well if Russ stop's baggin 14's I'll stop baggin 10's
mmmmmmm thinking, thinking.......thinking
mmmmmmm thinking, thinking.......thinking
Kawasaki Sportsbike Riders Club - Australia - Online Forum
Australian Kawasaki Sportsbike Riders Discussion Forum - All Welcome, free and easy to join, just click "register" below - www.ksrc-au.com
https://www.ksrc-au.com/phpBB3/
Ten riders...now NWS
Page 8 of 11
mmmmmmm thinking, thinking.......thinking
Re: Ten riders...now NWS
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 10:28 am
+1...for the bargeGosling1 wrote:the Barge rules supreme.
but a 10 is a way better point-to-point bike.
the 10 belongs on a track...somewhere
Re: Ten riders...now NWS
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:59 pm
I agree 100% mate - they do belong somewhere - behind a Barge in fact !!!Smitty wrote:.......+1...for the barge. the 10 belongs on a track...somewhere
PESKY 10'S BEHIND A BARGE.
Re: Ten riders...now NWS
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 7:01 pm
It was only a matter of timeGosling1 wrote:.....
PESKY 10'S BEHIND A BARGE....
Re: Ten riders...now NWS
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 7:08 pm
Coming up to lap the barge
Re: Ten riders...now NWS
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 7:09 pm
or did he just overtake them?Blurr wrote:Coming up to lap the barge
Re: Ten riders...now NWS
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 7:16 pm
hahaha, classic, doesnt matter who was lapping who the photo says different
Re: Ten riders...now NWS
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 7:35 pm
He was holding us up in two and through the back section, Glen and I managed to blast past him down the straight out of 12.....it was after that he realised that he needed a second go at the twist grip to get full throttleseiko1 wrote:or did he just overtake them?Blurr wrote:Coming up to lap the barge
Re: Ten riders...now NWS
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 7:40 pm
That's "into" mick....not "in two"
Re: Ten riders...now NWS
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 7:41 pm
He meant in turn 2 nOObseiko1 wrote:That's "into" mick....not "in two"
Re: Ten riders...now NWS
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 7:43 pm
I think he me nt turn two as " holding us up in turn two", poor gramma aye but steev
Re: Ten riders...now NWS
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 7:51 pm
"He was holding us up into and through the back section"
Well this makes more sense Grammatically you Bloody Heathens!
It should have read "He was holding us up on turn two and through the back section"
Well this makes more sense Grammatically you Bloody Heathens!
It should have read "He was holding us up on turn two and through the back section"
Re: Ten riders...now NWS
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 8:03 pm
fark off I was holding you lot up ! The story gets better every year !! next time round I will have been lapped 4 times and should have been in White
Look at that line ! how about the steely gaze behind the visor ??
When I see *any* photos of the Barge behind a 10 - happy to concede.
Look at that line ! how about the steely gaze behind the visor ??
When I see *any* photos of the Barge behind a 10 - happy to concede.
Re: Ten riders...now NWS
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 8:14 pm
Thanks Steve, where would I be without you to incorrectly correct my correct statementseiko1 wrote:That's "into" mick....not "in two"
Re: Ten riders...now NWS
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 8:15 pm
We're not quite at that stage yet Gos, give it another year or twoGosling1 wrote:fark off I was holding you lot up ! The story gets better every year !! next time round I will have been lapped 4 times and should have been in White
...