Further to all that, there is now talk that the RTA is considering screwing the general public over more by
following Victoria's lead of rediculously low tolerances for speeding, But they are considering 4km/h not 3km/h. At least the fine brackets are a bit more fair, but still nowhere near as "reasonable" as Victoria has considering they at least give you more grace with less points for the rediculously low penalties. Looks like NSW want to seriously take the "road nanny" crown off Victoria, I wonder how many licenses and jobs will be lost thanks to this.
Fines for 4km/h over limit wrote:THE Roads and Traffic Authority is considering plans to reduce the amount of leeway given to speeding motorists to as low as 4 km/h, according to senior police.
The proposal, which would follow a similar take-no-prisoners approach by the Victorian government, has drawn criticism from senior highway patrol officers, who believe the margin for error is too small.
...
The cameras, which can fine six drivers every second, will be set up in white Ford Territory vans operated by RTA-contracted company Redflex. Signs will inform drivers they have been ''checked'' after they pass the vans, which also shoot video
...
One senior Sydney policeman told The Sun-Herald, on condition of anonymity, that a 4 km/h tolerance was so small that a new set of tyres or the width of a speedometer needle could land motorists on the wrong side of the law. He said some radars had an error margin of plus or minus 3 km/h, while most police allowed a margin of 8 or 9 km/h at 60 km/h.
.."Research has shown that even travelling a few kilometres above the limit increases the risk of a crash. Drivers are reminded they should always drive within the speed limit and could be fined for speeding by even 1 km/h over the limit."
But some police and safety experts believe the approach would breed drivers who watch speedos at the expense of other dangers on the road.
..
An RTA spokesman said the undercover mobile cameras had proven useful in Victoria. But the NSW opposition roads spokesman on roads Andrew Stoner questioned whether they were an ''effective speeding deterrent''. ''The Keneally government is using the state's tragically high road toll as an excuse to raise revenue from drivers instead of increasing the use of highway patrols,'' Mr Stoner said.
NSW Police Association president Scott Weber said his union was vehemently opposed to the RTA mobile cameras, saying ''nothing is more effective than high-visibility highway patrols to prevent and detect traffic offences, prevent accidents and reduce deaths''.
...
An RTA spokesman said the safety of operators was a priority and any offences against camera crews would be prosecuted. ''NSW Police is a key partner in the implementation of the mobile speed camera program. Anyone assaulting an operator or damaging a mobile speed camera vehicle faces significant penalties, including imprisonment.''
I only quoted snippets and tried to keep it in context, but basically the police union think the lowering of the threshold is b-s, as are the cameras. If you decide to be a bit of a vigilante armed with spray paint or a hammer they aren't going to hold back on trying to get you and yet again the RTA is showing that they have a habit of ignoring all logical suggestions by "experts" in favour of their own agenda.
Jesus Christ the NRMA are going to have a field day with this one, even if it only stays as a scare tactic.
On a positive note, you at least can be a little more sure about what cars will be used in this scam, fleecing, bullshit or whatever you want to call it, at least for the first 3 months of its implementation.
viva la revolution!!