
priorities changed

Thats ok ill try your 9 out next time im up at the pits

http://www.sentechcomputers.com.auMistakes:
Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make all of them yourself.
Sorry to hear that. Ill keep my eye out for another bargain for yaMrWasabi wrote:yeah....but alas...it slipped away
priorities changed
Thats ok ill try your 9 out next time im up at the pits
OK, the C model was 40 odd kilos lighter then the previous model and was a completely new design. Welded subframe and 180 rear tyre. 46mm rwu forks and 300mm disks. Your C2 should have 4.5mm min thickness disks as well. The original C1 had 4mm min thick ones that were a little prone to warping with lots of track work. I was hooked as soon as I rode one, had to wait a year but ended up with the bike of my dreams.Richo wrote:so, any knowledgable hoons out there that can explain the major diffs between the b, c and e? .. obviously being complete different models, but more so the not so good features that I should be aware of now owning the C (which I now think is the best model .... only cos I now own one)
Plus an upgrade to a 32 bit ECU, carbs almost the same as the C series (the E were different, closer to the zx7r carbs than the C or F carbs), clip-ons below the triple clamp instead of above, larger front axle (same a s J series 6), factory seat cowl and a lug for a steering dampener on the left side of the frame.Phil wrote: The F was a major change, new body work with a different ducktail and fairing brace. Braced swingarm, another new engine that was slightly altered just making sure none of the exhausts you can get will only fit one modelFrame changed slightly. I think the disks may have chaged in size but the brakes were chaged to 4 piston nissins from the Tokico 6 pistons that were on the C & E models.
KSRC's original GPX owner gets back on the road with the now in excess of $25M GPX-Rgpxpunk wrote:8)damn now im the only gpx on the road until