ZX12 - 2000 vs 2002 what's you fav?

ZX2R, ZXR400, ZXR750, ZX6R, ZX7R, ZX9R & ZX12R & others.
User avatar
Strika
VIP MEMBER
VIP MEMBER
Posts: 8373
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 8:02 am
Bike: Yamaha
State: Victoria
Location: Melbourne

Re: ZX12 - 2000 vs 2002 what's you fav?

Post by Strika »

[quote="Blue14Hang on a second Hoffy!! If you rode on Freeways and straights all the time, you'd want the 14 too! :lol:[/quote]Marty, you crack me up mate.. :lol: How would you know it only went fast in a straight line, you wouldnt be able to see that far in to the distance would you.. :lol: :P[/quote]



Bloody hell mate!!! You're right!! :shock: I'll just have to get better mirrors for the 9!!! :lol:



Or.....wear my glasses! :oops:
"I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity to anyone, but they've always worked for me" Hunter S. Thompson.
There are really only two questions in life. 1.Which way do i go? 2.What is the lap record?
User avatar
Benno
KSRC Contributor
KSRC Contributor
Posts: 1241
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 4:33 pm
Bike: Scooter
State: Victoria
Location: Melbourne!!

Re: ZX12 - 2000 vs 2002 what's you fav?

Post by Benno »

You can tell Marty's back! There's always some kinda shit stirring when he's around!

Ease up on the old boy though mate, he did turn up to the meet point in his PJ's! :lol:
Vespa!
Toby
Warming up
Warming up
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 2:00 pm
Bike: Suzuki
State: New South Wales
Location: West Ryde Sydney

Re: ZX12 - 2000 vs 2002 what's you fav?

Post by Toby »

I ride a blue 01 ZX12, but i must say, the 04-06 is supa.

Might be time for an upgrade.
GSXR1000 White K9
User avatar
98ninja
KSRC Regular
KSRC Regular
Posts: 692
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 6:08 pm
Bike: ZX9R
State: New South Wales
Location: Inverell

Re: ZX12 - 2000 vs 2002 what's you fav?

Post by 98ninja »

red 2000 model
accidental 3rd gear wheely over a crest on the weekend
followed by a jab to the ribs from the pillion
really really really really fast bike
99 zx9r - back
User avatar
ross79
KSRC Member
KSRC Member
Posts: 274
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 10:16 am
Bike: Suzuki
State: Victoria
Location: Castlemaine

Re: ZX12 - 2000 vs 2002 what's you fav?

Post by ross79 »

I've only ever ridden my 12 and never thought I'd want anything different till I took a tweaked 14 for a spin. It's the only bike that's really made me consider buying something different. I agree with blue on this.
Now my brother's threatening to buy a 14 as he knows I can't afford one. :x
SOLD 2000 ZX12R .
User avatar
chuffed
KSRC Member
KSRC Member
Posts: 193
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 3:09 pm
Location: Mackay, Queensland

Re: ZX12 - 2000 vs 2002 what's you fav?

Post by chuffed »

Apples to Apples....
Give the 12 a tweek too and then compare.

My mates got a 14 and until recently always had a slight edge on me when racing side by side, a few more mods and now its not even close. I run at townsville nationals the other w/e dropped and extensions ran a 9.72@154 mph, would have gone quicker if it didnt run out of gearing 20-30 ft from the line and wasnt bottoming out when i launched :roll: bolt-on mods only engines never been apart. I even still ran the standard headers, though modded slightly.
weiloilbeefhooked
User avatar
ross79
KSRC Member
KSRC Member
Posts: 274
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 10:16 am
Bike: Suzuki
State: Victoria
Location: Castlemaine

Re: ZX12 - 2000 vs 2002 what's you fav?

Post by ross79 »

My 12 is teaked and has a custom map. But it's nothing compared to a tweaked 14. Tell your mate to remove the secondary butterflys on his 14 then compare ;)
SOLD 2000 ZX12R .
User avatar
Gosling1
Team Donut
Team Donut
Posts: 13823
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 9:30 pm
Bike: Z900
State: ACT
Location: Anarchy Road

Re: ZX12 - 2000 vs 2002 what's you fav?

Post by Gosling1 »

ross79 wrote:..... Tell your mate to remove the secondary butterflys on his 14 then compare ;).....
it makes a big difference eh !

:twisted:
".....shut the gate on this one Maxie......it's the ducks guts !!............."
User avatar
chuffed
KSRC Member
KSRC Member
Posts: 193
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 3:09 pm
Location: Mackay, Queensland

Re: ZX12 - 2000 vs 2002 what's you fav?

Post by chuffed »

I've never been able to compare, i rode his 14 already modded with flys out, pc3,muzzy slip-on,filters,ign. adv. with another bloke on a 12 chasing :lol:
and have pulled the flys on my 05 12 but havent ridden it on the street yet, the 02 12 doesnt have em.

Im surprised that you think that theres so much difference, though we havent run around much together on the road, mainly at a track down the 1/4 but too much launching from a standing start comes into the comparison then really, his bike is currently less modded and he is playing catch up, really just a pissing competition but its all good fun. ;)
weiloilbeefhooked
User avatar
Gosling1
Team Donut
Team Donut
Posts: 13823
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 9:30 pm
Bike: Z900
State: ACT
Location: Anarchy Road

Re: ZX12 - 2000 vs 2002 what's you fav?

Post by Gosling1 »

chuffed wrote:..... have pulled the flys on my 05 12 but havent ridden it on the street yet..........Im surprised that you think that theres so much difference........
You need to ride it on the road to appreciate the difference. When I pulled the secondary butterflies out, it made a very noticeable difference in top gear, when overtaking and too lazy to drop down any gears ... ;) - It just pulls like a train from <5k right through. With the flies still installed, you needed at least 7k on board to get it responding like that. Apparantly the flies don't even start to open until about 7k ?? Thats on my 05 MFP12....

8)
".....shut the gate on this one Maxie......it's the ducks guts !!............."
User avatar
frog
KSRC Member
KSRC Member
Posts: 202
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:28 am
Bike: ZX12R
State: Queensland
Location: Rockhampton
Contact:

Re: ZX12 - 2000 vs 2002 what's you fav?

Post by frog »

Wow straight back into contraversy. I had a 05 tuned at LAE, Micron full system (which I still think is the better pipe) PCIII and BMC's, the 00 now, ditto to above but a Yoshi full and K&N's. I liked the 05 look colour and ram air set up better, the 00 seems to surge with a side wind (anyone else notice this?). They made virtually the same amount of maximum HP (Im not suprised when you really think about it). I have found the old chart tomorrow and compare it with the other I have to compare and post both but looking at the one in front of me they both make about about 115 at 2 seconds throttle. The bueatiful curves means it seem to wheelstand with the same smoothness and they both go ballsitic at 8000rmp. I dont know if James (can anyone tell me what he was called on here??) had anything done to the supension ? But it doesnt seem stiff and I am under 80kg andhe looked to be a big guy to me. The forks dont seem to have been dropped and it doesnt turn in like I remember the 05 doing (it was) so I am putting a new front tyre on first and the see if it still needs it. The brakes seem as good as the radials but I will be more concerned about maintaining the six potters. Seemed to do a pretty good stoppie the other day but the rear made an alarming clunk I will have to take a look at. (it IS 8 years old after all). I was going to put the entrie front end off the 05 on the 00 as I figured it would need pulling up more than the naked with less weight etc but Im not worried about it now. Was it mainly done for fashion, will a well maintained set of six pots out brake a poorly maintained radial, who knows ?
Oh and by the way Alex said whilst his dyno was bit ummm harsh ? that it was putting out about 178 unadjusted (as did the 05) but James had made 184 at ksrc dyno day sometime back ??
He alse had a blue turboed one in there, turboed and with nos in the hump.
FARK ME :shock: Reckons you HAVE to be in 3rd before hitting the blue bottle :twisted:
Gos if you do get NOS can I have go at the Island, PLEASE !!
We can swap bikes and report back with a definitve result. 8) At this point but I feel the 00 has the stronger motor off the bottom and middle. Ive ridden a couple of thous and bus's in the interveneing years but nothing has the top end hit of 12, STILL.
Jedi of the darKside
Just because you can ride, doesnt mean you should. My reason on this earth is an example to others what NOT to do.
seraph
KSRC Regular
KSRC Regular
Posts: 648
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 9:31 am
Bike: ZX12R
State: Queensland
Location: 1000 miles from home

Re: ZX12 - 2000 vs 2002 what's you fav?

Post by seraph »

Gos, I got the same model as you, any chance of an idiot-proof guide to doing the butterfly mod thing? maybe an explanation of what it is, first :D

I just ride the farker :oops:

oh and welcome back frog-person, nice choice of bike there :)

J.
the sweet things don't stick around but the bullshit lasts forever
http://www.twistybitz.net
User avatar
frog
KSRC Member
KSRC Member
Posts: 202
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:28 am
Bike: ZX12R
State: Queensland
Location: Rockhampton
Contact:

Re: ZX12 - 2000 vs 2002 what's you fav?

Post by frog »

Ah Blue 14, the man with the big bike and body and little itty ummmmmm...... :lol:
Still scared of the rain mate ? :twisted:
Id take a GTR14 over one of those butt ugly mothers anyday.

http://australianscreen.com.au/titles/mad-max/clip1/

Ah its good to be back :lol:

Theres a clip just for you too Gos
http://australianscreen.com.au/titles/mad-max/clip2/
Jedi of the darKside
Just because you can ride, doesnt mean you should. My reason on this earth is an example to others what NOT to do.
User avatar
frog
KSRC Member
KSRC Member
Posts: 202
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:28 am
Bike: ZX12R
State: Queensland
Location: Rockhampton
Contact:

Re: ZX12 - 2000 vs 2002 what's you fav?

Post by frog »

The 05 model had a set of secondary butterflies controlled by the computer above the original rider controlled ones.
It was to stop people cartwheeling them. Worked for most people :oops:
The 14 is the same. (but uglier)
Jedi of the darKside
Just because you can ride, doesnt mean you should. My reason on this earth is an example to others what NOT to do.
User avatar
frog
KSRC Member
KSRC Member
Posts: 202
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:28 am
Bike: ZX12R
State: Queensland
Location: Rockhampton
Contact:

Re: ZX12 - 2000 vs 2002 what's you fav?

Post by frog »

OK checked the charts, they may as well be from the same bike.
'00/'05 better/worse :roll: Same/same more like it.
BUT it does beg the question, correlation between dyno and seat of the pants.
The '00 sure as shit FEELS like it comes on way stronger (and maybe if we could zoom in down low on the chart it would show that) and I would swear James has original gearing on it too (I havent checked yet) where as the 05 was geared down a far bit both front and rear.
Guess a back to back is the only way eh Gos maaaayyyyttttteeeeee 8)
Jedi of the darKside
Just because you can ride, doesnt mean you should. My reason on this earth is an example to others what NOT to do.
Post Reply