Post your results from the dyno.

[Darwin]

191.9 hp 155.4 n.M.
I have it booked in at Flywheels on the 3rd. It will be interesting to see the result after a tune up.

[kawaden]

04 Z1000 full akro exhaust, pcIII with custom map, bmc air filter with air box lid removed yada yada

[hoffy]

I am surprised the Zeddy pulld more power than a ZX9 .. sorted

[SoundGuy]

176.1 hp - 116.4 m.N.

[Neka79]

04 Z1000 full akro exhaust, pcIII with custom map, bmc air filter with air box lid removed yada yada

sweet....

ive got cans.. havent done the air box mod yet, as i havent got the bmc filter or pc3....

that will all be done together... and as soon as i sort this BS with the ex... mwahahahaha

[Mel]

My '03 636 got 117.2 hp at 13214rpm, 66.4m.N at 10842rpm.

[MadKaw]

Yes I think some of the figures look a bit odd..
In particular Glens and Watties, Gixxer Daves looked a bit low.
The z1000 was pretty high compared to the 9's too..
Compared to our previous dyno day the comparatve numbers are quite different.

Heres some other reference
http://www.sportrider.com/tech/146_weig ... l#kawasaki

My 10 - 180 and 126m.n
750 - 131 and 77m.n

To give an example at our last dyno day we had
3 x 04/05 zx10rs all with 153 to 155 rwhp
07 zx10r - 161 hp
Z1000 - 123 hp
98 ZX9r (with 110,000ks) - 131hp
zxr750r - 112 hp
had my 10 on the same dyno a month back - 168 hp

[Phil]

98 ZX9r (with 110,000ks) - 130hp ?

131 dave.......

[kawaden]

when i had the Z maped at doin bikes several years ago it made 128.6 hp and 93.5 nm at the wheel. on this dyno the figures were 150.1hp and 106.2 nm at the crank. given losses of 10 to 15% from crank to wheel the figures compare well. also both dynos show peak turque and power at the same point and the shape of the curves are the same. based on all this i think the results are about right.

[MadKaw]

when i had the Z maped at doin bikes several years ago it made 128.6 hp and 93.5 nm at the wheel. on this dyno the figures were 150.1hp and 106.2 nm at the crank. given losses of 10 to 15% from crank to wheel the figures compare well. also both dynos show peak turque and power at the same point and the shape of the curves are the same. based on all this i think the results are about right.

I'm not questioning your figures Its the comparative figures to the 9's that looked odd..
If 150hp = 128 at the rear wheel (which sounds about right).
that would mean the zx9rs would then be 148 hp = 126 rwhp.. Which is a bit low for 02 / 03's with slip ons.. not a huge amount though.

Using the same conversion, Watties zx10r would be putting out 142 rwhp and Gixxerdaves K6 with full system and PC3 would be about 144hp. Glens zx10 (the same as Watties) 149 hp.. all a bit low to any other RWHP dyno.

The last dyno Day Watties had more HP than Glens, now Glens has 7 more (same models same mods), the 06/07 also had 5 to 6 more than the 04/05, this one had em the same as Glens 04/05..
The 12's should be about the same as the 10's but were much higher..
It looked like the bikes on early read higher than the ones on later..

BTW, my 98 zx9r put out about 142 on the doin bikes dyno.. and it was running crap...

anyway, it was all good fun and great day..

[kawaden]

i see what you mean, maybe the opperator was having an off day.

[James]

I was surprised that my 2000 ZX12 with a full Yoshi system, K&Ns & PCIII achieved less than 2hp more that Hoffy's ZX12 which is stock except for a cut-down slip on! (184.9 Vs 183) Im glad I bought my bike with all the mods - I'd hate to spend $2500 for a 2hp increase!

[JetPilot]

I am surprised the Zeddy pulld more power than a ZX9 .. sorted

Must be the fuel injection.

[Poyda]

Crappy looking 96 ZX6R With Akra 4-1, probably some jet work and a stock filter

108.1hp @ 12903rpm 66.9N.m @ 10078rpm

[gixxerdave]

gixxerdave got like 165 or something on kis k6 gixxer with a full system and pc3

169 horses actually.. and 112nm of torque.. PC3 with a micron map, K&N, pipe... and the valves are overdue for checking.

engine mod time here i come. (bugger the cams)