Sun Aug 13, 2006 8:06 pm
Sun Aug 13, 2006 8:33 pm
Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:38 pm
Sun Aug 13, 2006 10:21 pm
Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:48 am
Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:35 am
Mon Aug 14, 2006 11:11 am
Mon Aug 14, 2006 11:18 am
Smitty wrote:this question has been looked at in detail...in BIKE
will post it up tonite
and me???
the 12 of course
and imo....
the 14 is no real advance over the 12r or the ZZR1100/1200
'cept for its got a bigger engine
in fact it called a ZZR1400 in other markets around the world![]()
cheers
Mon Aug 14, 2006 11:35 am
red_dave wrote:The 12 is an extension of the ZX9R shape so that's why it's got my vote...
Mon Aug 14, 2006 11:50 am
Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:01 pm
Duane wrote:
How can you say it's no real advance over the ZZR1100 ??? Or 1200??? thats ridiculous.
The technology that goes into the ZX14, is more along the lines of the new 10 and 6, which is more newage and advanced that your twelve, the 1100 or any other sports tourers the big K has produced before! thats just because your eyes are clouded over because you bought a 12 on the verge of a new bike being released that covers all the bases that the 12 did, apart from adjustable suspension (which is a easy fix anyways with $$, but hey, you're going to get a can for it anyways? might as well put something more worth while into it!!).
If it was no real advancement over it, they woulda stuck with the twelve!!
Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:02 pm
Smitty wrote:Duane wrote:
How can you say it's no real advance over the ZZR1100 ??? Or 1200??? thats ridiculous.
The technology that goes into the ZX14, is more along the lines of the new 10 and 6, which is more newage and advanced that your twelve, the 1100 or any other sports tourers the big K has produced before! thats just because your eyes are clouded over because you bought a 12 on the verge of a new bike being released that covers all the bases that the 12 did, apart from adjustable suspension (which is a easy fix anyways with $$, but hey, you're going to get a can for it anyways? might as well put something more worth while into it!!).
If it was no real advancement over it, they woulda stuck with the twelve!!
nup..don't agree Mr D
imo..Kawasaki took bits from the 12 and 1100/1200 series bikes and made the 14...which is still a good bike
the 14s frame is based on the 12s, the engine is not totally new
(unlike the 12s was, when it came out)
the 14 could be seen as a ZZR1200 with a bigger engine and other updated bits ..better suspension, better brakes, up to date styling
whY?
simply, the 14 looks like an upgraded ZZR1200
and I think that is what Kawasaki intended
might be wrong...but
cheers
Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:04 pm
Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:07 pm
Mick C wrote:hehehe, I voted for the 14 after reading all the 12 owners defensive posts...you guys are so sensitive, it's like shooting fish in a barrel![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:09 pm
Jonno wrote:Mick C wrote:hehehe, I voted for the 14 after reading all the 12 owners defensive posts...you guys are so sensitive, it's like shooting fish in a barrel![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hehe yer right,![]()
But can we say anything and not be seen as defensive?