Dyno figures
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:03 pm*post deleted*
Kawasaki Sportsbike Riders Club - Australia - Online Forum
Australian Kawasaki Sportsbike Riders Discussion Forum - All Welcome, free and easy to join, just click "register" below - www.ksrc-au.com
http://www.ksrc-au.com/phpBB3/
Dyno figures
Page 1 of 3
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:03 pmPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:42 pm*post deleted*
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:51 pmDegreed cams
Ported head
real stock
ps 170 does not equal " 190 hp at full noise "
ps you forgot too mention 1290 kit .................
fab
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:05 pmPity you're not in Melbounre, I could giver your bike a run and give you a graph with any number you like on it 
Using different "standards" gives different results. Using a dyno to get a number is wrong. It should be used for diagnostics and comparisons. Do a run, make a mod do a run. Run 1 gives a vluse of 1, run two might give a value of 1.1 or .99 and you know if you're going in the right direction or not.
They're fun to run bikes on back to back for bragging rights too
But to simply pull a number off it doesn't mean much, it's just a number.
He's got impressive numbers though. 158 to 195 is great
Every shed should have one
Using different "standards" gives different results. Using a dyno to get a number is wrong. It should be used for diagnostics and comparisons. Do a run, make a mod do a run. Run 1 gives a vluse of 1, run two might give a value of 1.1 or .99 and you know if you're going in the right direction or not.
They're fun to run bikes on back to back for bragging rights too
But to simply pull a number off it doesn't mean much, it's just a number.
He's got impressive numbers though. 158 to 195 is great
Every shed should have one
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:08 pmi tend too agree,
i got mine remapped 6 months ago & it felt like a completely different bike.
fab
i got mine remapped 6 months ago & it felt like a completely different bike.
fab
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:17 pm*post deleted*
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:18 pmposts deleted
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:31 pmSteve_TLS wrote:...
Using different "standards" gives different results. Using a dyno to get a number is wrong. It should be used for diagnostics and comparisons. Do a run, make a mod do a run. Run 1 gives a vluse of 1, run two might give a value of 1.1 or .99 and you know if you're going in the right direction or not.
...snip..
Steve
exactly..and also for tuning/tune up purposes
I saw what happened with mine when it went on about 3 yrs ago
before/after zorst fitment and fiddle with timing chain to get cam timing spot on followed by a carb fiddle..ooops tune
rear wheel hp went from about 95 (from memory) to about 105 with all that
took about an hour and a bit of fiddling/screw driver use
and a new set of plugs and air filter as well
was a different bike
cheers
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:33 pm*post deleted*
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:53 pmIt would be all the trips to the tyre joint that would worry me, they only seem to last a fortnight on most of the 12s around here.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 10:00 pmbut mick loves us when we come visit !
it will be interesting too see what you get !
the dyno i have been using must be defective as it gives power at wheel not crank.
fab
it will be interesting too see what you get !
the dyno i have been using must be defective as it gives power at wheel not crank.
fab
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 10:24 amI don't delete or edit too many posts, but this is ridiculous. Please keep your petty name calling and abuse to private emails.
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 12:35 pmaardvark wrote:I don't delete or edit too many posts, but this is ridiculous. Please keep your petty name calling and abuse to private emails.
Yep, I've locked the 9 or 12 thread as that had gone too far...
Looks like the moderators may have to start moderating if this happens again...
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 12:50 pmposts deleted
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 1:23 pmI suppose in the end - It's up to the administrators to decide
not yours
(my 2 bob anyways)
not yours
(my 2 bob anyways)