by Shifty » Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:53 pm
As I said I'm all for ditching speed limits entirely. Like almost everyone here I have been fined for speeding before, but on only one of those occasions could I understand why someone would feel justified in saying my actions were inappropriate. On that occasion I was fined for 120km/h in a 70km/h zone, where I belted off from a set of lights to 100km/h and slowed straight back to the speed limit at 70km/h.
The police "estimated" my speed at 120km/h and insisted that I had slowed down only because their lights came on. In that situation, I think I would have deserved a ticket and understood where they were coming from. Unfortunately for me the truth of the matter was that I was over the limit for about 3 seconds, hitting a maximum of 100km/h (second gear hit the rev limiter at 102km/h, and I didn't hit it!), slowing down immediately of my own accord and not just speeding recklessly. Unfortunately the cop didn't believe me, so based on his understanding of what had happened I suppose the ticket was justified.
The other tickets I have had were purely revenue raising (eg. cruising 20 over the limit on the highway, getting booked 10 k's over down a hill, that kinda stuff).
As you can see I'm no angel myself, but there is never a situation where 200km/h in a 60km/h zone is an appropriate speed.