mrmina wrote:not good mate.
its normally ur recorded speed -3km/h is how they determine ur final speed.
.
Smitty1955 wrote:think mina is correct here
Rossi wrote:No, it was on the bike .......that's why I can't understand it![]()
The only thing I can think of around 17th December was it was raining and the lights turned to red as I got to the line and I gunned it across cos I knew I wouldn't be able to stop safely on the shitty road surface.
Farkin speeds I go at, it's embarrassing to be done so close to the limit![]()
TopCat wrote:
I'd get the photo ..... you never know, a mate in work who drives a Camry wagon got his photo and found it was a Falcon wagon with a similar number.
neka79 at optusnet.com.au wrote:mate..i got done TWICE in the space of an hour on my way to PI 3 yrs ago (as
most ppl here kno)...64 and then 65 in a 60 zone..farkin ridiculous!! i was
riding with 5 bikes, all 6 of us were in the pics & i tried 3 times to get
it over turned, and never got out of it...good luck mate..
neka
TopCat wrote:
Could you not have argued that only one bike was speeding and happened to pass the camera at the same time as the others were legitimately in the piccie?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests