GPz900r Keihin Main Jets

Before this knowledge gets lost out of a Clean Air Circuit - I'm wondering if anyone knows the logic of carb set-up of the detuned later bikes? I know the following facts:
Obviously they use a different needle but all of the other carb specs seem identical.
Now from what I can deduce a #138 main jet has twice the area as a #100 - hence the AU carbs can draw 1/2 the fuel so only need half the air to get the air:fuel ratios about right - hence one of the ports of the intake is blocked.
But what has me bemused is that there is ONLY a 7hp difference in quoted power.
I know actually getting to them is a different story, but returning the A8 carbs to the A1 spec is relatively cheap & easy to do - but with only that slight power increase the associated reduction in fuel economy just doesn't seem worth it.
I don't recall ever reading that the later bikes had anything else related to engine breathing different- but maybe they did?
I can't help think I'm missing something here....
- US spec A1 CVK34 Main Jet #135/138 = twin port air intake = 115hp
AU spec A8 CVK34 Main Jet #100 = single port air intake = 108hp
Obviously they use a different needle but all of the other carb specs seem identical.
Now from what I can deduce a #138 main jet has twice the area as a #100 - hence the AU carbs can draw 1/2 the fuel so only need half the air to get the air:fuel ratios about right - hence one of the ports of the intake is blocked.
But what has me bemused is that there is ONLY a 7hp difference in quoted power.
I know actually getting to them is a different story, but returning the A8 carbs to the A1 spec is relatively cheap & easy to do - but with only that slight power increase the associated reduction in fuel economy just doesn't seem worth it.
I don't recall ever reading that the later bikes had anything else related to engine breathing different- but maybe they did?
I can't help think I'm missing something here....