Thu Nov 24, 2005 3:56 pm
Gosling1 wrote::lol: thankyou Captain Sensible![]()
ps - you doing the long way home this week ?
Thu Nov 24, 2005 5:29 pm
Mick C wrote:Gosling1 wrote:so where does that leave the ZX9-R, ZX10-R and ZX12-R ?? The Yanks may have changed 1 year model designation for the ZX6, but that still leaves a whole lot of other models that use the 'R' designation in both countries, not 'R'-less as stated..........
They're called Ninja's![]()
![]()
But seriously, it's pretty simple. They have ZX6R, ZX10R, ZX12R, ZX12, ZX14, ZX6...we have ZX6R, ZX10R, ZX12R, ZZR1200, ZZR1400, ZZR600
....or something like that anyway
Thu Nov 24, 2005 5:36 pm
I-K wrote: Close, but on the right track. Until the ZZ-R1200 came along and spoiled the pattern, the Americans knew sporty Kwakas as ZX-R's and sports-toury Kwakas as ZX's... with the exception of the ZXR750, which was the ZX7 over there.
It's all a rich tapestry...
Sat Dec 03, 2005 4:13 pm
Sat Dec 03, 2005 5:55 pm
Sat Dec 03, 2005 6:38 pm
Sat Dec 03, 2005 7:08 pm
Sat Dec 03, 2005 7:48 pm
Sat Dec 03, 2005 8:02 pm
.......bwahahahahahaah that is exactly what one of my mates said - he has not owned a bike for a couple of years (but we did find him a '77 z1000A1 2 weeks agoberyl wrote:Mate the comments I hear from people that have been pillions on 12rs is "i get on the back of the bike and it is like faaaark".![]()
![]()
indeed - once you have had a > 1 litre road burner for a while, you will look back and wonder how you ever did those long trips on the 600 in the first placeberyl wrote: You would miss the six along the way mind you its horses for courses.
Sat Dec 03, 2005 8:05 pm
Sat Dec 03, 2005 8:11 pm
Sat Dec 03, 2005 8:36 pm
Sat Dec 03, 2005 10:28 pm
Gosling1 wrote:...have not done Mt Hotham yet, but from all reports its a good fang
Sat Dec 03, 2005 10:43 pm
Sun Dec 04, 2005 9:03 am