SUOMY helmets? Good or Crap?

Riding gear and Clothing Discussion

Postby mitch179 » Mon Oct 30, 2006 8:27 pm

could you link me to the document you got that out of ? ?

cause people dont seem to believe me when i tell em about it :S
mitch179
KSRC Member
KSRC Member
 
Posts: 326
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 12:53 pm
Location: GoldCoast Aus

Postby Gosling1 » Mon Oct 30, 2006 8:29 pm

RG wrote:....I think I should stop drinking too... :lol:


Mate, when I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading !

8)
".....shut the gate on this one Maxie......it's the ducks guts !!............."
User avatar
Gosling1
Team Donut
Team Donut
 
Posts: 13823
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 9:30 pm
Location: Anarchy Road
Bike: Z900
State: ACT

Postby aardvark » Mon Oct 30, 2006 8:36 pm

mitch179 wrote:could you link me to the document you got that out of ? ?

cause people dont seem to believe me when i tell em about it :S


I probably should have pointed out that it's South Australian legislation. No idea if the same applies interstate. I always forget that legislation isn't the same interstate.

http://www.parliament.sa.gov.au/Catalog ... 236.un.htm
User avatar
aardvark
Apprentice Post Whore :-)
Apprentice Post Whore :-)
 
Posts: 5766
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 6:45 pm
Location: Adelaide, S.A.
Bike: Yamaha
State: South Australia

Postby greenmeanie » Tue Oct 31, 2006 11:38 am

aardvark wrote:
mitch179 wrote:could you link me to the document you got that out of ? ?

cause people dont seem to believe me when i tell em about it :S


I probably should have pointed out that it's South Australian legislation. No idea if the same applies interstate. I always forget that legislation isn't the same interstate.

http://www.parliament.sa.gov.au/Catalog ... R/1999.236.
un.htm


No Aus Stds sticker = Infringement Notice(definitely in QLD). Just hope they don't look at your helmet if you ever get pulled up. :wink: :)
Glenn
2009 ZX10R
greenmeanie
KSRC Contributor
KSRC Contributor
 
Posts: 1858
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 5:10 pm
Location: Ipswich QLD
Bike: ZX10R
State: Queensland

Postby RG » Tue Oct 31, 2006 3:23 pm

greenmeanie wrote:No Aus Stds sticker = Infringement Notice(definitely in QLD). Just hope they don't look at your helmet if you ever get pulled up. :wink: :)


Taken from...
Queensland
Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995
Transport Operations (Road Use Management—Road Rules) Regulation 1999
Reprinted as in force on 7 July 2006


approved motorbike helmet means a helmet that complies
with—
(a) AS 1698–1988; or
(b) another standard the chief executive considers is at least
equal to that standard.
"...The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena." - Theodore Roosevelt
RG
KSRC Contributor
KSRC Contributor
 
Posts: 1454
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 11:28 pm
Location: WA
Bike: It's not worth Mentioning
State: Western Australia

Postby Stereo » Tue Oct 31, 2006 3:31 pm

I have been stopped over the years by at least 8 police officers and not a single one has ever checked my helmet for a sticker........
The world is round. It has no point.
User avatar
Stereo
KSRC Addict
KSRC Addict
 
Posts: 4578
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 8:01 am
Location: Pt Cook, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Pacific Ocean, Earth
Bike: ZX10R
State: Victoria

Postby BladeBoy » Tue Oct 31, 2006 3:52 pm

RG wrote:
greenmeanie wrote:No Aus Stds sticker = Infringement Notice(definitely in QLD). Just hope they don't look at your helmet if you ever get pulled up. :wink: :)


Taken from...
Queensland
Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995
Transport Operations (Road Use Management—Road Rules) Regulation 1999
Reprinted as in force on 7 July 2006


approved motorbike helmet means a helmet that complies
with—
(a) AS 1698–1988; or
(b) another standard the chief executive considers is at least
equal to that standard.


That should get you out of it anyway
Image
BladeBoy
KSRC Regular
KSRC Regular
 
Posts: 973
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Central Coast, NSW

Postby RG » Tue Oct 31, 2006 5:32 pm

BladeBoy wrote:
approved motorbike helmet means a helmet that complies
with—
(a) AS 1698–1988; or
(b) another standard the chief executive considers is at least
equal to that standard
.


That should get you out of it anyway

Yeah, only if you are a good friend of the 'chief executive' :goodman:
"...The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena." - Theodore Roosevelt
RG
KSRC Contributor
KSRC Contributor
 
Posts: 1454
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 11:28 pm
Location: WA
Bike: It's not worth Mentioning
State: Western Australia

Postby mitch179 » Tue Oct 31, 2006 8:30 pm

ah sweet, i wasnt too worried, ive never had the sticker checked before!

i think im going to pluck one out of the inside of an old lid tho and stick it on the inside of my new one incase and just say there isnt one on the outside cause i tore it off in favour of bling. or something lame like that :P

i saved over 230 bucks buying over seas , thats after shipping.
mitch179
KSRC Member
KSRC Member
 
Posts: 326
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 12:53 pm
Location: GoldCoast Aus

Postby Gosling1 » Tue Oct 31, 2006 8:49 pm

RG wrote:(b) another standard the chief executive considers is at least
equal to that standard




forgive my sarcasm, but this is so typical of bogus legislation that is just a goldmine for a good lawyer.......

What qualifications does the chief executive have that enables him to make an informed decision about helmet standards FFS ??? :roll: I can guarantee you that he won't have a Degree in Physics, or Engineering, or Chemistry et al....of course the chief executive can rely on the advice of his own departmental *experts*, who wouldn't know shit from clay - if they did they sure as hell would be working elsewhere, where their talents would be appreciated and utilised.........

sorry for the rant, but this type of *Bullshit* legislation is worthy of nothing else but ridicule.

8)
".....shut the gate on this one Maxie......it's the ducks guts !!............."
User avatar
Gosling1
Team Donut
Team Donut
 
Posts: 13823
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 9:30 pm
Location: Anarchy Road
Bike: Z900
State: ACT

Postby Neka79 » Tue Oct 31, 2006 9:56 pm

Gosling1 wrote:
RG wrote:(b) another standard the chief executive considers is at least
equal to that standard




forgive my sarcasm, but this is so typical of bogus legislation that is just a goldmine for a good lawyer.......

What qualifications does the chief executive have that enables him to make an informed decision about helmet standards FFS ??? :roll: I can guarantee you that he won't have a Degree in Physics, or Engineering, or Chemistry et al....of course the chief executive can rely on the advice of his own departmental *experts*, who wouldn't know shit from clay - if they did they sure as hell would be working elsewhere, where their talents would be appreciated and utilised.........

sorry for the rant, but this type of *Bullshit* legislation is worthy of nothing else but ridicule.

8)

valid rambling gos.....

also note- trying to remove a STICKER WILL LEAVE A HORRIBLE "VOID" AS THE STICKERS FALL APART...

if u do a track day theres a bloody good chance they will look for the sticker

i also have never had my lid checked by a plod...
Neka
2006 Zeddy 1000
1996 VS series 2 S pak Ute
Image
User avatar
Neka79
Extreme Post Whore :-)
Extreme Post Whore :-)
 
Posts: 13115
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 12:20 am
Location: Adelaide......nah its cool..no really!!
Bike: Z900
State: South Australia

Previous

Return to Riding Gear Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests