OK - we are discussing a shuttle valve fork. Very easy to comprehend:
Oil is forced through a bunch of holes in what might look to some like a baffled tube - or like the end of them WW2 machine guns - it gets pushed by a sloppily fitted plastic ring, which inevitably wears. But let's assume that this ring - this "shuttling band" (the ring that is) - is el-perfecto, and has a wonderful seal on the tube (which it won't and never did!). The design is out-dated and was never really that brilliant an idea...
A damper-rod or shuttle valve fork relies on damping created via the velocity squared route: oil goes through holes (remember) just like a bunch of people leaving a concert hall - one or two through the doorway is really easy; but when someone shouts "fire", well the whole kaboodle jams solid as all the big and small alike try to exodus simultaneously - right, so suspension... simply put, ya get easy and piss poor under-controlled movement or oscillation, until the speed in there gets up enough to do something to the holes - damping.
Problem is that it can be sloppy when initially braking and changing direction - load on, load off front - and then harsh when it hits a bump; like a petrol station forecourt curb for example... So, really one gets the worst of it all.... Thicker oil will do something about the initial timing of damping - like when it starts - but will only make the "doorway" to the concert hall jam up with even fatterer people!!! ....so we have the variable orificia damped system nowadays, commonly known as a cartridge fork - where shims and port type (etc etc) combined with oil sort, go to timing the control from start to finish and hopefully gain some good stuff and lose the bad that was there with the shuttle valve design!
Preloading a spring only delays commencement of movement - the rate (of the spring) will return to being as it normally would (0.7 kgf per mm for EG) once the "break-point" is surpassed (25mm of preloading on a 0.7 = 17.5kgs x 2 legs). Preloading will also only reduce travel or stroke in the fork or damper from the perspective that it gets less of an initial "run-up" at things - the stroking or bottoming in a fork is controlled by other factors - or should be if being doctored appropriately!!!
The only way that preloading a spring could change a 120mm stroke fork to being restricted to 100mm (for EG) travel would be if enough of the active-coils were closed up that they bound together, and movement therefore, became impossible - if the cap at the fork top is having to be compressed a lot so as to get the staunchion to join it from using excessive preloading tube, then really, a set of springs would be the go!!!
If you have a bike with shuttle valve fork, then usually if the budget does not extend to retro-fitting cartridges from another type of bike, then I fit some tuneable valve bodies in on top of the shuttle valve seats, and completely annihilate the old method of forming damping (V2) - this route by way of a parts grabber and a few cunning tricks internally allows the fork to gain compression adjustment, whilst catching/controlling the conserved energy from the spring easier by way of rebound damping.
Anyways, sorry for prattling on....
