TORQUE TALK !

For general Technical and Performance Discussions

Postby mike-s » Fri Sep 15, 2006 7:02 pm

For what its worth

rf900=281 w/me in gear, (87kw) (309kwatt/tonne)
gpx750=273 w/me in gear, (59kw) (216kwatt/tonne)
carolla=1132with just me, (86kw) (75kwatt/tonne)
Image
If it hurts, you aren't doing it right.
User avatar
mike-s
Apprentice Post Whore :-)
Apprentice Post Whore :-)
 
Posts: 6142
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 5:43 am
Location: Arncliffe, Sydney
Bike: Suzuki
State: New South Wales

Postby Strika » Fri Sep 15, 2006 7:08 pm

Yeah power to weight is important too. But I was more thinking about the pure number of torque units needed to shift a heavier object initially. ie- they build a car engine to produce higher torque numbers lower in the rev range to enable it to get off the line! :lol:
"I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity to anyone, but they've always worked for me" Hunter S. Thompson.
There are really only two questions in life. 1.Which way do i go? 2.What is the lap record?
User avatar
Strika
VIP MEMBER
VIP MEMBER
 
Posts: 8373
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 8:02 am
Location: Melbourne
Bike: Yamaha
State: Victoria

Postby mike-s » Fri Sep 15, 2006 7:13 pm

as you can see i re-edited my post ane cleared it up a bit.
also the example of 250hp/2500rpm for a truck vs 140hp/12krpm for a bike.
I was mainly posting for that person who was power/torque confused.
Image
If it hurts, you aren't doing it right.
User avatar
mike-s
Apprentice Post Whore :-)
Apprentice Post Whore :-)
 
Posts: 6142
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 5:43 am
Location: Arncliffe, Sydney
Bike: Suzuki
State: New South Wales

Postby Strika » Fri Sep 15, 2006 10:28 pm

mike-s wrote:as you can see i re-edited my post ane cleared it up a bit.
also the example of 250hp/2500rpm for a truck vs 140hp/12krpm for a bike.
I was mainly posting for that person who was power/torque confused.


Yeah I understand what you were saying, and agree, I was more trying to make the point that with more weight, the torque figure nneds to increase at lower revs in order to move it initially.

Frogz made the point of likening gearing changes to changing a lever ratio also. Which effectively increases torque, but not in numbers, more in numbers for a given road speed! I found that interesting too.

Does anyone have a real understanding of the realtionship of power and torque in actual acceleration?
"I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity to anyone, but they've always worked for me" Hunter S. Thompson.
There are really only two questions in life. 1.Which way do i go? 2.What is the lap record?
User avatar
Strika
VIP MEMBER
VIP MEMBER
 
Posts: 8373
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 8:02 am
Location: Melbourne
Bike: Yamaha
State: Victoria

Postby Smitty » Fri Sep 15, 2006 10:39 pm

Strika wrote:
Yeah I understand what you were saying, and agree, I was more trying to make the point that with more weight, the torque figure nneds to increase at lower revs in order to move it initially.



aah now Strika ...we get technical :lol:
in order for torque to be usable
we need to be harness it.....hence the flywheel

low torque and a BIG flywheel (once rotating)
has can move a vehicle that is heavier
than one with higher torque and a small flywheel

hence
dragracers use big flywheels*
and bikes use...small ones 8)


*not Top Fuel...but sedans

cheers
GOTTA LUV the 12R!!
User avatar
Smitty
VIP MEMBER
VIP MEMBER
 
Posts: 10910
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 1:59 pm
Location: 3rd rock from the Sun
Bike: ZX12R
State: Victoria

Postby mike-s » Fri Sep 15, 2006 11:22 pm

Think of torque as the ability to overcome inertia, or lack therof (i.e. when stationary).

The more power (torque) you have to overcome inertia, the easier it will be to turn the drivetrain. thusly a bike with 20nm* of torque at 2500rpm (say about a 400-500cc bike) has to rev till about 7000 (where it has 40-50nm* of torque, and the engine is turning faster to do the same work), slip the clutch and drop it to hoist the front up. However a bike with 45+nm* of torque at 2500 only really has to roll on vigerously to hoist the front up, there's more power available to do the same level of work (not taking into account different vehicle weights and suspension dynamics).

[*] the above figures were plucked out of thin air for the example.

oh and smitty, flywheels only work to "store" the intertia provided by the engine, theres a whole nother level of "stuff" happening when you start putting flywheel weights in as well as engine capacity.
Image
If it hurts, you aren't doing it right.
User avatar
mike-s
Apprentice Post Whore :-)
Apprentice Post Whore :-)
 
Posts: 6142
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 5:43 am
Location: Arncliffe, Sydney
Bike: Suzuki
State: New South Wales

Postby Johnnie5 » Sat Sep 16, 2006 12:16 am

Smitty wrote:
Strika wrote:
Yeah I understand what you were saying, and agree, I was more trying to make the point that with more weight, the torque figure nneds to increase at lower revs in order to move it initially.



aah now Strika ...we get technical :lol:
in order for torque to be usable
we need to be harness it.....hence the flywheel

low torque and a BIG flywheel (once rotating)
has can move a vehicle that is heavier
than one with higher torque and a small flywheel

hence
dragracers use big flywheels*
and bikes use...small ones 8)


*not Top Fuel...but sedans

cheers


except that racers use a lighter fluwheel to get the motor to spin up quicker
Johnnie5
KSRC Regular
KSRC Regular
 
Posts: 546
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Marayong

Postby Smitty » Sat Sep 16, 2006 7:17 am

Johnnie5 wrote:
except that racers use a lighter fluwheel to get the motor to spin up quicker


not the blokes I know who race manuals......
however
your comment is why lots go the auto route in dragracing
a flexplate...is light

cheers
GOTTA LUV the 12R!!
User avatar
Smitty
VIP MEMBER
VIP MEMBER
 
Posts: 10910
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 1:59 pm
Location: 3rd rock from the Sun
Bike: ZX12R
State: Victoria

Postby Johnnie5 » Sat Sep 16, 2006 9:25 am

Smitty wrote:
Johnnie5 wrote:
except that racers use a lighter fluwheel to get the motor to spin up quicker


not the blokes I know who race manuals......
however
your comment is why lots go the auto route in dragracing
a flexplate...is light

cheers


not quite

most go auto for reduced time in gearchanges and for the high stall
Johnnie5
KSRC Regular
KSRC Regular
 
Posts: 546
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Marayong

Postby GForce » Sat Sep 16, 2006 10:43 am

for a car if you use a lighter flywheel, you can rev quicker on the straights but when going up hill, you lose torque.
User avatar
GForce
KSRC Member
KSRC Member
 
Posts: 269
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 1:53 pm
Location: Adelaide
Bike: ZX6R
State: South Australia

Postby HemiDuty » Mon Sep 18, 2006 11:03 pm

According to Gran Tourismo anyway.....

For the track I will stick to concerning myself with power figures (and run off areas :wink: ), as long as it makes good smooth power in a 4-5k band I am happy, as long as I can get more of it!
Drmsby Middleton
DC Racing

Extreme Motorsports
M2R
Castrol
ColourSmart Chroming
Hi Side Leathers
Teknic
Sidi
DID Racing Chain
Goodridge
User avatar
HemiDuty
KSRC Contributor
KSRC Contributor
 
Posts: 1963
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 6:27 pm
Location: Brisbania
Bike: Don't have one
State: Queensland

Previous

Return to General Tech & Performance Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests