Switch to full style
For general Technical and Performance Discussions
Post a reply

Dynamic v Static Balancing ???????

Sun Jan 15, 2006 6:34 pm

Guys the ZX10R is due for a new set of tyres and its due time to remove the dunnies and fit the pilots. But which is better static or dynamic balancing. Some say with chain slack creating unbalance ( qualified mechanic i'm told) that there is no requirement for precise balance ,BUT I beg to differ when yer hammerin it. Your thoughts and experiences would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers Crootie.

Sun Jan 15, 2006 6:53 pm

I would recommend having the wheels balanced when the new tyres are fitted..........unbalanced tyres will cause vibration problems.

8)

Sun Jan 15, 2006 7:48 pm

Depending upon who is doing it, static balance is as equaly acurate as having a machine do it.

Sun Jan 15, 2006 11:24 pm

I would rather a craftsman do it with Eye & skill then some pimply (working for parts for my dirtbike apprentice) Krusty Demon Wannabee do it with a machine. .
If you get a good rim & have the trye fitted at right place on the tyre you may not need any balance weights. "Tiggr's" had four rears fitted & only one needed to be weightet to get it true.
Tyres are the most important part of your bike after all.
Cheers Brett

Mon Jan 16, 2006 8:12 am

I have my tyres fitted at the race track and they static balanse out there.. Never had any troubles up to 270kph...

Mon Jan 16, 2006 8:42 am

Important that it's done right of course, last time I went to a Kwasaki dealer in the city here in Melbourne for a new tire I came out with a bike that would become a tank slapper at 80kmh if you took the hands of the handlebars for wahtever reason, won't be going back there again ever!!

Once I had my bingle and needed new front wheel and hoop then that's fixed the tank slapping. Rather not have to stack though everytime this sort of thing happens so will avoid them in future.

Mon Jan 16, 2006 11:09 am

in my misguided youth...I worked at weekends in a garage/tyre shop
(car tyres obviously) and I learnt-
you can static balance a wheel/tyre combo but....
only up to a point where the side wall height is greater or equal
than the tread width, but you may have to rotate the tyre on the rim
to get the 'best' balance

when you get a tyre where the aspect ratio is less than 100%
it is most likely that you will have to dynamically the tyre/wheel assembly (mainly because the WHEEL manufacturer does not balance the wheel)

however.. if you are involved in motorsport and....
you are willing to rotate the tyre on the rim (maybe ignoring the tyre manufacturers 'mark') until you get the best balance you can sometimes get away with NO balance weights. Why? because the wheel has been balanced and the tyres are too

good bike shops should (or do) do the same
I noticed that BKwaka ignored the tyre makers mark on my new
front hoop fitted recently to the GPx. the result?
the front wheel only has a one very small balance weight on it


hth

cheers

Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:16 am

Article from AMCN back in October said that dynamic balancing is superior as it not only finds the weight difference from top to bottom,but also locates weight descrepencies side-to-side across the rim.
They reckon that a wheel with a 40gram imbalance will generate eight kilos of 'flog' at 100km/h which has to be handled by the suspension.
Go figure.

Cheers
Mick :)

Wed Jan 18, 2006 12:57 pm

As long as its done right, static balancing will be fine. i've been balancing tyres on a static balancer for over 5 years... no probs to speak of from the racers. its easy, and doesn't take very long to do

Wed Jan 18, 2006 3:44 pm

Balance is not the only thing that causes vibration in tyres and rims. Most people think that just because a wheel vibrates that it is "balance" that's causing it. The fact is that lateral and radial "run-out" in a tyre or rim is far worse.

Several things contribute to tyre/rim run-out, one is obviously a slightly bent or buckled rim (the NZ guy that I used to work with one day said that the car he was working on had a "bunt rum"....took be ages to work out he was saying "bent rim".... :D ), the second is a poorly manufactured tyre where the tread has been laid incorrectly or inner belts/plies have been fitted badly (during manufacture and therefore is a quality control issue) or it's hit something and damaged the belts/plies which is called a "separation" because it causes the tread to separate from the plies (usually), the third is poor fitting where the beads have not been "seated" against the wheel flange and the last is slight radial or lateral run-out in both wheel and tyre but when fitted in the same spot/location cause a big run-out problem.

A good tyre technician will run the rim up separately on a balancer, when they have removed the old tyre, just to visually check for run-out. Once he/she knows the rims is OK he/she would fit the tyre to the rim and align the manufacturers marks. There is usually a white dot which you aligned with the valve however some rim manufacturers have a balance mark(looks like a drill mark in the rim) where they recommend a tyre be aligned with that also has been separately checked (which has a yellow dot), and the yellow dot aligns with this mark.

After the tyre has been fitted the fitter should spin the tyre up and visually check to see how much out either radial or lateral run-out is in the tyre/rim. You can measure the run-out but visual is pretty accurate and much quicker. If there is more run-out in the tyre/rim assembly then you think is acceptable, the best thing to do is "Crack and rotate" the tyre 180 degrees on the rim and run the tyre up again. If this doesn't get rid of the run-out try cracking and rotating the tyre 90 degrees and so on till you get it right. This is called "rotationally matching" the tyre and rim assembly. If the run-out is greater then your little hearts desires then get another tyre and try again. If however you continue on with this process and find that all the tyres from that manufacturer have "run-out" then you know you have been trying to fit a Dunlop tyre to the rim .... :D :D :D :D ...sorry...just kidding... but it is true that some manufacturers quality control is far better then others and subsequently some manufacturers tyres have no run-out at all....you just gotta find out which manufactures that do.

The thing that differentiates run-out from a balance problem is speed. Run-out gets worse the faster you go because obviously the tyre isn't round so it vibrates and wobbles more and more and more.

Balance on the other hand usually only occurs at constant speeds and can come in and go out at various speeds like come in at 60km/h and go out at 70km/h and then reoccur at 120km/h and disappear at 130km/h.

You can of course have a combination of both run-out and tyre in-balance. If the run-out is small then most people will have a balance done and possible won't notice the run-out cause they don't go that fast to really have a problem with it. Thus most people only think of balance as a problem.

What's also important is that if everyone went around checking their tyres for run-out quite a few manufacturers would be forced to lift their production and quality control standards because ...no one would buy them.
Post a reply